STATE vs ILIYAS Advocate - KARAN SINGH CHARAN — 33/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201/34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBA010005862019
Filing Number
297/2019
Filing Date
24-Jan-2019
Registration No
33/2019
Registration Date
24-Jan-2019
Court
DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
154
Police Station
BALOTRA POLICE STATION
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ILIYAS Advocate - KARAN SINGH CHARAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Iliyas & Others (33/2019) The Session Court acquitted all five defendants (Iliyas, Shoyab, Sahil Khan alias Sohe Khan, Sher Mohammad alias Sirajuddin, and Amin Khan) of charges under IPC Sections 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 329, 307 read with 149, and Arms Act 4/25. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and committed violent attacks with weapons on the complainant and others. Key witnesses—including victims and alleged eyewitnesses—either recanted their police statements or contradicted the prosecution narrative, attributing injuries to accidental falls rather than assault. The court noted all police documents bore signatures on blank pages and concluded the evidence was insufficient to establish the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Oct-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jun-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Oct-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jun-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
11-Apr-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2022
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Sep-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Jul-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
-
08-Jan-2021
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Sep-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Jun-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Mar-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2020
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Nov-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2019
Hearing arguments on Charge
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-May-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2019
Case Summary: State v. Iliyas & Others (33/2019) The Session Court acquitted all five defendants (Iliyas, Shoyab, Sahil Khan alias Sohe Khan, Sher Mohammad alias Sirajuddin, and Amin Khan) of charges under IPC Sections 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 329, 307 read with 149, and Arms Act 4/25. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and committed violent attacks with weapons on the complainant and others. Key witnesses—including victims and alleged eyewitnesses—either recanted their police statements or contradicted the prosecution narrative, attributing injuries to accidental falls rather than assault. The court noted all police documents bore signatures on blank pages and concluded the evidence was insufficient to establish the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts