STATE vs ILIYAS Advocate - KARAN SINGH CHARAN — 33/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201/34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJBA010005862019
Filing Number
297/2019
Filing Date
24-01-2019
Registration No
33/2019
Registration Date
24-01-2019
Court
DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
154
Police Station
BALOTRA POLICE STATION
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
ILIYAS Advocate - KARAN SINGH CHARAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Iliyas & Others (33/2019) The Session Court acquitted all five defendants (Iliyas, Shoyab, Sahil Khan alias Sohe Khan, Sher Mohammad alias Sirajuddin, and Amin Khan) of charges under IPC Sections 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 329, 307 read with 149, and Arms Act 4/25. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and committed violent attacks with weapons on the complainant and others. Key witnesses—including victims and alleged eyewitnesses—either recanted their police statements or contradicted the prosecution narrative, attributing injuries to accidental falls rather than assault. The court noted all police documents bore signatures on blank pages and concluded the evidence was insufficient to establish the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Iliyas & Others (33/2019) The Session Court acquitted all five defendants (Iliyas, Shoyab, Sahil Khan alias Sohe Khan, Sher Mohammad alias Sirajuddin, and Amin Khan) of charges under IPC Sections 148, 341, 323, 324, 326, 329, 307 read with 149, and Arms Act 4/25. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an unlawful assembly and committed violent attacks with weapons on the complainant and others. Key witnesses—including victims and alleged eyewitnesses—either recanted their police statements or contradicted the prosecution narrative, attributing injuries to accidental falls rather than assault. The court noted all police documents bore signatures on blank pages and concluded the evidence was insufficient to establish the prosecution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts