JETHARAM vs STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 112/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBA010004842026

Filing Number

375/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

SIWANA POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JETHARAM

    Adv. RAJENDRA PAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Jetharam v. State of Rajasthan (Case 112/2026) The Session Court, Balotara granted bail to petitioner Jetharam under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offenses under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court found that Jetharam was named in the FIR but no concrete evidence linked him to the alleged cargo theft scheme; his arrest on 24.02.2026 was deemed premature given investigation time requirements and the absence of serious charges against him, especially since a co-accused's bail was already approved. The court imposed bail conditions requiring personal bonds of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jetharam v. State of Rajasthan (Case 112/2026) The Session Court, Balotara granted bail to petitioner Jetharam under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offenses under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court found that Jetharam was named in the FIR but no concrete evidence linked him to the alleged cargo theft scheme; his arrest on 24.02.2026 was deemed premature given investigation time requirements and the absence of serious charges against him, especially since a co-accused's bail was already approved. The court imposed bail conditions requiring personal bonds of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case