KISHOR vs STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 111/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBA010004832026

Filing Number

374/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

PACHPADRA POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHOR

    Adv. KAUSHAL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 111/2026 Kishor v. State of Rajasthan (Session Court, Balotara) The court granted bail to petitioner Kishor (age 29) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 351(2)(3) IPC and Sections 67, 67(A) IT Act. The court found that no previous case was pending against the petitioner, he had been in custody since March 9, 2026, and the alleged offense does not carry capital or life imprisonment as punishment. Consequently, bail was approved on submission of personal bond of ₹25,000 and surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 111/2026 Kishor v. State of Rajasthan (Session Court, Balotara) The court granted bail to petitioner Kishor (age 29) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 351(2)(3) IPC and Sections 67, 67(A) IT Act. The court found that no previous case was pending against the petitioner, he had been in custody since March 9, 2026, and the alleged offense does not carry capital or life imprisonment as punishment. Consequently, bail was approved on submission of personal bond of ₹25,000 and surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case