GANESH vs DUNGRA RAM — 10/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 165,166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 13th March 2026.
MACT Main - MACP
CNR: RJBA010001912020
Filing Number
32/2020
Filing Date
17-02-2020
Registration No
10/2020
Registration Date
17-02-2020
Court
DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GANESH
Adv. CHENA RAM
Respondent(s)
DUNGRA RAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
Plaintiff Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Plaintiff Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Plaintiff Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ganesh v. Dungra Ram (MACТ Claim 10/2020) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Balotra awarded compensation of ₹6,500 to petitioner Ganesh for simple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on April 23, 2019, caused by respondent Dungra Ram's negligent driving of a Tata Magic taxi (RJ 04 TA 5644) at high speed, which overturned after sudden braking. The tribunal held the driver liable for negligence and directed the insurance company (TATA AIG) to pay the award plus 7% interest from November 25, 2019, despite the vehicle being operated without a valid route permit—applying the "pay and recover" doctrine allowing the insurer to later recover amounts from the driver and owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ganesh v. Dungra Ram (MACТ Claim 10/2020) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Balotra awarded compensation of ₹6,500 to petitioner Ganesh for simple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on April 23, 2019, caused by respondent Dungra Ram's negligent driving of a Tata Magic taxi (RJ 04 TA 5644) at high speed, which overturned after sudden braking. The tribunal held the driver liable for negligence and directed the insurance company (TATA AIG) to pay the award plus 7% interest from November 25, 2019, despite the vehicle being operated without a valid route permit—applying the "pay and recover" doctrine allowing the insurer to later recover amounts from the driver and owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts