GANESH vs DUNGRA RAM — 10/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 165,166. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 13th March 2026.
MACT Main - MACP
CNR: RJBA010001912020
Filing Number
32/2020
Filing Date
17-Feb-2020
Registration No
10/2020
Registration Date
17-Feb-2020
Court
DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANESH
Adv. CHENA RAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.DUNGRA RAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Ganesh v. Dungra Ram (MACТ Claim 10/2020) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Balotra awarded compensation of ₹6,500 to petitioner Ganesh for simple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on April 23, 2019, caused by respondent Dungra Ram's negligent driving of a Tata Magic taxi (RJ 04 TA 5644) at high speed, which overturned after sudden braking. The tribunal held the driver liable for negligence and directed the insurance company (TATA AIG) to pay the award plus 7% interest from November 25, 2019, despite the vehicle being operated without a valid route permit—applying the "pay and recover" doctrine allowing the insurer to later recover amounts from the driver and owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Feb-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Nov-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Jul-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-May-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
31-Mar-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Jul-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-May-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2020
Case Summary: Ganesh v. Dungra Ram (MACТ Claim 10/2020) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Balotra awarded compensation of ₹6,500 to petitioner Ganesh for simple injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident on April 23, 2019, caused by respondent Dungra Ram's negligent driving of a Tata Magic taxi (RJ 04 TA 5644) at high speed, which overturned after sudden braking. The tribunal held the driver liable for negligence and directed the insurance company (TATA AIG) to pay the award plus 7% interest from November 25, 2019, despite the vehicle being operated without a valid route permit—applying the "pay and recover" doctrine allowing the insurer to later recover amounts from the driver and owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts