CHOGARAM ETC. vs STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 45/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Bail Cancelled on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJBA010001352026

Filing Number

72/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Cancelled

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

SIWANA POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHOGARAM ETC.

    Adv. KAPIL SHRI MALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Chogaram v. State (Case 45/2026) The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of petitioners Chogaram and Bhairam under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy and land fraud: they allegedly obtained a forged death certificate (dated 1999) for their brother Dalaram, who was actually alive, and used it to fraudulently transfer his agricultural land in Kankhī and Pādarū to their own names through collusion with village officials. The court found prima facie evidence of the petitioners' involvement in the conspiracy and held them culpable for illegally acquiring valuable farmland, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chogaram v. State (Case 45/2026) The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of petitioners Chogaram and Bhairam under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy and land fraud: they allegedly obtained a forged death certificate (dated 1999) for their brother Dalaram, who was actually alive, and used it to fraudulently transfer his agricultural land in Kankhī and Pādarū to their own names through collusion with village officials. The court found prima facie evidence of the petitioners' involvement in the conspiracy and held them culpable for illegally acquiring valuable farmland, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case