CHOGARAM ETC. vs STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — 45/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Bail Cancelled on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJBA010001352026
Filing Number
72/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Balotra District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Cancelled
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
SIWANA POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHOGARAM ETC.
Adv. KAPIL SHRI MALI
Respondent(s)
STATE Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Chogaram v. State (Case 45/2026) The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of petitioners Chogaram and Bhairam under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy and land fraud: they allegedly obtained a forged death certificate (dated 1999) for their brother Dalaram, who was actually alive, and used it to fraudulently transfer his agricultural land in Kankhī and Pādarū to their own names through collusion with village officials. The court found prima facie evidence of the petitioners' involvement in the conspiracy and held them culpable for illegally acquiring valuable farmland, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Chogaram v. State (Case 45/2026) The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of petitioners Chogaram and Bhairam under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy and land fraud: they allegedly obtained a forged death certificate (dated 1999) for their brother Dalaram, who was actually alive, and used it to fraudulently transfer his agricultural land in Kankhī and Pādarū to their own names through collusion with village officials. The court found prima facie evidence of the petitioners' involvement in the conspiracy and held them culpable for illegally acquiring valuable farmland, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts