STATE GOVERNMENT vs VIJAY SINGH — 17/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,302. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJAL380000252017
Filing Number
25/2017
Filing Date
14-10-2017
Registration No
17/2017
Registration Date
14-10-2017
Court
ADJ KATHUMAR HQ
Judge
1-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
382
Police Station
KHERLI
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE GOVERNMENT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIJAY SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State Government v. Vijay Singh (CIS 17/2017) Decision Date: April 23, 2026 Charge: Murder under IPC Section 302 Verdict: Acquitted - The court found the accused, Vijay Singh, not guilty of the charges. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death of his mother-in-law, Smt. Rama, with the requisite intention and knowledge. While evidence established that injuries occurred, the court found insufficient direct evidence linking the accused to committing murder. The medical and circumstantial evidence was deemed inconclusive, and witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State Government v. Vijay Singh (CIS 17/2017) Decision Date: April 23, 2026 Charge: Murder under IPC Section 302 Verdict: Acquitted - The court found the accused, Vijay Singh, not guilty of the charges. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death of his mother-in-law, Smt. Rama, with the requisite intention and knowledge. While evidence established that injuries occurred, the court found insufficient direct evidence linking the accused to committing murder. The medical and circumstantial evidence was deemed inconclusive, and witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts