STATE GOVERNMENT vs VIJAY SINGH — 17/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,302. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJAL380000252017

Filing Number

25/2017

Filing Date

14-Oct-2017

Registration No

17/2017

Registration Date

14-Oct-2017

Court

ADJ KATHUMAR HQ

Judge

1-Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

382

Police Station

KHERLI

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVERNMENT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State Government v. Vijay Singh (CIS 17/2017) Decision Date: April 23, 2026 Charge: Murder under IPC Section 302 Verdict: Acquitted - The court found the accused, Vijay Singh, not guilty of the charges. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death of his mother-in-law, Smt. Rama, with the requisite intention and knowledge. While evidence established that injuries occurred, the court found insufficient direct evidence linking the accused to committing murder. The medical and circumstantial evidence was deemed inconclusive, and witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  15. 09-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  18. 22-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  19. 01-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  20. 30-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  22. 09-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  23. 21-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  24. 03-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  25. 27-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  26. 09-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  27. 28-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  28. 02-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge

  29. 15-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 14-Oct-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State Government v. Vijay Singh (CIS 17/2017) Decision Date: April 23, 2026 Charge: Murder under IPC Section 302 Verdict: Acquitted - The court found the accused, Vijay Singh, not guilty of the charges. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death of his mother-in-law, Smt. Rama, with the requisite intention and knowledge. While evidence established that injuries occurred, the court found insufficient direct evidence linking the accused to committing murder. The medical and circumstantial evidence was deemed inconclusive, and witness testimonies contained contradictions and inconsistencies that undermined the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case