POORAN vs LILA Advocate - MUKESH SHARMA — 50/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section civilsuit. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 29th April 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJAL300000452016
Filing Number
50/2016
Filing Date
23-05-2015
Registration No
50/2016
Registration Date
23-05-2015
Court
CJ JD Malakhera HQ
Judge
1-CJ JM MALAKHERA
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
POORAN
Adv. RAMBAHADUR SINGH KANVAR
KISHOR
Adv. RAMBADUR SINGH KANVAR
Respondent(s)
LILA Advocate - MUKESH SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJ JM MALAKHERA
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Civil Case 34/50/2016 - Puran v. Lila Decision Date: 29-04-2026 The court dismissed the petitioners' (Puran and Kishor's) suit against respondent Lila regarding disputed agricultural land in Bijaad village. The petitioners sought a decree for transfer of 1/4 property share and an injunction preventing the respondent from occupying the land, alleging an agreement (Exhibit 01) dated 17-05-1991 supported the transfer. However, the court found the petitioners failed to prove the agreement's validity—crucially, they presented no signatures on the document and called no witnesses to authenticate it. Additionally, the respondent's thumb impression on the agreement was only partially acknowledged, creating evidentiary gaps. The court determined the petitioners could not establish their legal right to the property through the disputed agreement and therefore had no basis for either decree sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Case 34/50/2016 - Puran v. Lila Decision Date: 29-04-2026 The court dismissed the petitioners' (Puran and Kishor's) suit against respondent Lila regarding disputed agricultural land in Bijaad village. The petitioners sought a decree for transfer of 1/4 property share and an injunction preventing the respondent from occupying the land, alleging an agreement (Exhibit 01) dated 17-05-1991 supported the transfer. However, the court found the petitioners failed to prove the agreement's validity—crucially, they presented no signatures on the document and called no witnesses to authenticate it. Additionally, the respondent's thumb impression on the agreement was only partially acknowledged, creating evidentiary gaps. The court determined the petitioners could not establish their legal right to the property through the disputed agreement and therefore had no basis for either decree sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts