state vs kasid@kasim Advocate - jagdish chandra thiran — 290/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL290001652014
Filing Number
290/2014
Filing Date
20-01-2014
Registration No
290/2014
Registration Date
20-01-2014
Court
CJ JM Ramgarh HQ
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
RAMGARH
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
kasid@kasim Advocate - jagdish chandra thiran
omprakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Service of Non-bailable warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 30-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 16-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
| 06-03-2026 | Service of Non-bailable warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Omprakash & Kasid (Case 290/2014) The court acquitted Omprakash (son of Ramlal), the sole accused tried, of theft charges under Section 379 IPC for allegedly stealing a Mahindra tractor (Registration No. 02 RA 7312) on August 7, 2013. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt due to significant contradictions in witness statements, procedural irregularities in the investigation (including gaps in documentary evidence and improper seizure procedures), and the absence of any incriminating material recovered from the accused. The co-accused Kasid was declared an absconder and proceedings against him remain pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Omprakash & Kasid (Case 290/2014) The court acquitted Omprakash (son of Ramlal), the sole accused tried, of theft charges under Section 379 IPC for allegedly stealing a Mahindra tractor (Registration No. 02 RA 7312) on August 7, 2013. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt due to significant contradictions in witness statements, procedural irregularities in the investigation (including gaps in documentary evidence and improper seizure procedures), and the absence of any incriminating material recovered from the accused. The co-accused Kasid was declared an absconder and proceedings against him remain pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts