state vs Mosam Khan Advocate - Rajkumar yadav — 166/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL290001512015
Filing Number
166/2015
Filing Date
04-06-2015
Registration No
166/2015
Registration Date
04-06-2015
Court
CJ JM Ramgarh HQ
Judge
2-ACJM Ramgarh
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
NOUGANWA
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mosam Khan Advocate - Rajkumar yadav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM Ramgarh
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 22-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 166/2015 Court Decision: The accused Mosam Khan was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) on 16-03-2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the prosecution's allegations that Mosam Khan recklessly drove a tempo (vehicle RJ 02 UA 3163) at high speed on 30-04-2015, causing the death of Mukesh, the court determined that prosecution witnesses—identified as eyewitnesses—contradicted themselves during cross-examination. No witness could conclusively confirm that the vehicle number was RJ 02 UA 3163 or that Mosam Khan was the driver. Additionally, the complainant failed to appear despite repeated court summons. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 166/2015 Court Decision: The accused Mosam Khan was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) on 16-03-2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the prosecution's allegations that Mosam Khan recklessly drove a tempo (vehicle RJ 02 UA 3163) at high speed on 30-04-2015, causing the death of Mukesh, the court determined that prosecution witnesses—identified as eyewitnesses—contradicted themselves during cross-examination. No witness could conclusively confirm that the vehicle number was RJ 02 UA 3163 or that Mosam Khan was the driver. Additionally, the complainant failed to appear despite repeated court summons. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts