state vs Mosam Khan Advocate - Rajkumar yadav — 166/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL290001512015

Case disposed

Filing Number

166/2015

Filing Date

04-06-2015

Registration No

166/2015

Registration Date

04-06-2015

Court

CJ JM Ramgarh HQ

Judge

2-ACJM Ramgarh

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

NOUGANWA

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304A

Petitioner(s)

state

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Mosam Khan Advocate - Rajkumar yadav

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM Ramgarh

16-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

19-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

05-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

22-12-2025

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Case 166/2015 Court Decision: The accused Mosam Khan was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) on 16-03-2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the prosecution's allegations that Mosam Khan recklessly drove a tempo (vehicle RJ 02 UA 3163) at high speed on 30-04-2015, causing the death of Mukesh, the court determined that prosecution witnesses—identified as eyewitnesses—contradicted themselves during cross-examination. No witness could conclusively confirm that the vehicle number was RJ 02 UA 3163 or that Mosam Khan was the driver. Additionally, the complainant failed to appear despite repeated court summons. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 166/2015 Court Decision: The accused Mosam Khan was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) on 16-03-2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the prosecution's allegations that Mosam Khan recklessly drove a tempo (vehicle RJ 02 UA 3163) at high speed on 30-04-2015, causing the death of Mukesh, the court determined that prosecution witnesses—identified as eyewitnesses—contradicted themselves during cross-examination. No witness could conclusively confirm that the vehicle number was RJ 02 UA 3163 or that Mosam Khan was the driver. Additionally, the complainant failed to appear despite repeated court summons. The court applied the benefit of doubt to the accused, finding insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CJ JM Ramgarh HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case