state vs fakru @ bhakku Advocate - SANAT JAIN — 47/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379, 411. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL290001022014
Filing Number
47/2014
Filing Date
22-01-2014
Registration No
47/2014
Registration Date
22-01-2014
Court
CJ JM Ramgarh HQ
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
295
Police Station
NOUGANWA
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Respondent(s)
fakru @ bhakku Advocate - SANAT JAIN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 47/2014 State v. Fakru @ Bhakku The court acquitted the accused Fakru @ Bhakku of theft charges under IPC Sections 379 and 411. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole the motorcycle (TS Sport, Engine No. CF5NB1723620, Chassis No. MD625MF58B3N93735) or that it was stolen property when seized. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft, inadequate witness testimony establishing ownership of the motorcycle at the time of alleged theft, and gaps in the prosecution's case regarding the recovery of the motorcycle from the accused's possession. The accused was discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 47/2014 State v. Fakru @ Bhakku The court acquitted the accused Fakru @ Bhakku of theft charges under IPC Sections 379 and 411. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole the motorcycle (TS Sport, Engine No. CF5NB1723620, Chassis No. MD625MF58B3N93735) or that it was stolen property when seized. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft, inadequate witness testimony establishing ownership of the motorcycle at the time of alleged theft, and gaps in the prosecution's case regarding the recovery of the motorcycle from the accused's possession. The accused was discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts