State vs Mausamdeen Advocate - Rahman khan — 427/2012

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379, 411. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL290000142012

Filing Number

427/2012

Filing Date

24-Nov-2012

Registration No

427/2012

Registration Date

24-Nov-2012

Court

CJ JM Ramgarh HQ

Judge

1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

NOUGANWA

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379, 411

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mausamdeen Advocate - Rahman khan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 427/2012 The court acquitted the accused, Mausamdeen (age 36), of theft charges under IPC Sections 379 and 411, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he stole the motorcycle (Hero Honda Splendor, Reg. No. RJ31SD7677) recovered from his possession on 28 September 2012. The judgment identified significant evidentiary gaps: no eyewitness testimony to the alleged theft, inconsistencies in police documentation and witness statements regarding motorcycle details, and inadequate proof that the seized vehicle was actually stolen property rather than lawfully possessed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  12. 22-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  16. 30-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  17. 16-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  18. 04-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  23. 06-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  24. 28-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  25. 10-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  26. 24-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  27. 12-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  28. 02-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  29. 16-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  30. 08-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  31. 01-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  32. 22-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  33. 11-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  34. 03-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  35. 27-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  36. 17-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  37. 06-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  38. 06-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  39. 27-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  40. 16-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  41. 14-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  42. 07-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  43. 05-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  44. 05-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  45. 15-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  46. 08-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  47. 18-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  48. 02-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  49. 21-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  50. 20-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  51. 05-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  52. 18-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  53. 31-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  54. 20-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  55. 24-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  56. 24-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  57. 01-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  58. 10-Feb-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  59. 09-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  60. 15-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  61. 01-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  62. 30-May-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  63. 07-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  64. 17-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  65. 03-Dec-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  66. 29-Sep-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  67. 24-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  68. 18-May-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  69. 15-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  70. 22-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  71. 19-Oct-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  72. 04-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  73. 23-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  74. 02-Dec-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  75. 01-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  76. 24-Nov-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. 427/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 427/2012 The court acquitted the accused, Mausamdeen (age 36), of theft charges under IPC Sections 379 and 411, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he stole the motorcycle (Hero Honda Splendor, Reg. No. RJ31SD7677) recovered from his possession on 28 September 2012. The judgment identified significant evidentiary gaps: no eyewitness testimony to the alleged theft, inconsistencies in police documentation and witness statements regarding motorcycle details, and inadequate proof that the seized vehicle was actually stolen property rather than lawfully possessed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case