Ramchandar vs Radhey Shyam Sunar Advocate - Sh. Koushal Bhardwaj — 322/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 30th March 2026.
C S - Civil Suit
CNR: RJAL240002162015
Filing Number
612/2015
Filing Date
21-07-2015
Registration No
322/2015
Registration Date
21-07-2015
Court
CJ JD Thanagazi
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramchandar
Adv. Sh. Ramkaran Chopra
Respondent(s)
Radhey Shyam Sunar Advocate - Sh. Koushal Bhardwaj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 24-03-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 23-03-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
| 19-03-2026 | Reply of Application/ Steps by parties |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case 322/2015 - Ramchandar v. Radhey Shyam Sunar Advocate & Others The court dismissed petitioner Ramchandar's suit seeking a permanent injunction against respondents from opening a door/access on the north side of their shop and purchased land adjoining his residential property. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the disputed road was his private property—government records showed it was a public road constructed and maintained by the village panchayat. Since the respondents' property has a legitimate right to northern access and the road is public, they cannot be restrained from using it. The petitioner's case collapsed due to insufficient evidence and self-contradictions in witness testimony regarding ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case 322/2015 - Ramchandar v. Radhey Shyam Sunar Advocate & Others The court dismissed petitioner Ramchandar's suit seeking a permanent injunction against respondents from opening a door/access on the north side of their shop and purchased land adjoining his residential property. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove the disputed road was his private property—government records showed it was a public road constructed and maintained by the village panchayat. Since the respondents' property has a legitimate right to northern access and the road is public, they cannot be restrained from using it. The petitioner's case collapsed due to insufficient evidence and self-contradictions in witness testimony regarding ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts