Ramkishor vs Kailash — 272/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 16th May 2026.
C S - Civil Suit
CNR: RJAL240001292015
Filing Number
528/2015
Filing Date
16-Apr-2015
Registration No
272/2015
Registration Date
16-Apr-2015
Court
CJ JD Thanagazi
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramkishor
Adv. DP Dixit
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kailash
-
2.Ramji Lal Sharma
-
3.Ramshwroop
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case 272/2015 - Ramkishor v. Kailash and others Court Decision (dated 16.05.2026): The court rejected the petitioner Ramkishor's suit for partition and permanent injunction against defendants Kailash, Ramji Lal Sharma, and Ramswroop. The court found that Ramkishor failed to prove his 1/4 share in the disputed property with credible evidence, while the defendants established their possession and use of the contested house and courtyard. Applying principles of adverse possession under the Limitation Act 1963, the court determined that the defendants' 28 years of open possession extinguished Ramkishor's rights, and his claim was barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
02-May-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
31-May-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Mar-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Aug-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Feb-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
04-May-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2019
Adr u/s Section 89 CPC/ Counseling
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2019
Adr u/s Section 89 CPC/ Counseling
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2018
Issues
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2018
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2018
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Aug-2018
Awaiting Report
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jul-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2018
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Dec-2017
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Jul-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-May-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2017
Argument Of Application
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2017
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2017
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2016
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Nov-2016
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2016
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2016
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
31-May-2016
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Apr-2016
Reply Suit
-
07-Jan-2016
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2015
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2015
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2015
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
21-May-2015
Reply Suit
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
11-May-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 272/2015
Case 272/2015 - Ramkishor v. Kailash and others Court Decision (dated 16.05.2026): The court rejected the petitioner Ramkishor's suit for partition and permanent injunction against defendants Kailash, Ramji Lal Sharma, and Ramswroop. The court found that Ramkishor failed to prove his 1/4 share in the disputed property with credible evidence, while the defendants established their possession and use of the contested house and courtyard. Applying principles of adverse possession under the Limitation Act 1963, the court determined that the defendants' 28 years of open possession extinguished Ramkishor's rights, and his claim was barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts