State Govt. vs Ghasiram Advocate - Sh. Rajesh Kumar Meena — 2235/2015
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 323,341,336-34. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 17th March 2026.
Cr.reg. - Cr.Regular
CNR: RJAL230005612015
Filing Number
1080/2015
Filing Date
05-Nov-2015
Registration No
2235/2015
Registration Date
05-Nov-2015
Court
CJ JM Thanagazi
Judge
2-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Govt.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ghasiram Advocate - Sh. Rajesh Kumar Meena
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Ghasiram & Another (2235/2015) Court Decision (17.03.2026): The court found both accused—Ghasiram (age 50) and Pappuram (age 25)—guilty under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 34 (voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful restraint, and common intention) but acquitted them under Sections 336 and 34 (act endangering life). The accused were convicted of assaulting the complainant and his brother Chander on 13.09.2015 with sticks and stones, causing injuries, but insufficient evidence established rash or negligent endangerment. Both were sentenced to 3 months simple imprisonment and ₹200 fine each with 7 days additional imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
-
06-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jun-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jan-2019
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Feb-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2017
For examination of witnesses
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Apr-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Nov-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 2235/2015
Case Summary: State v. Ghasiram & Another (2235/2015) Court Decision (17.03.2026): The court found both accused—Ghasiram (age 50) and Pappuram (age 25)—guilty under IPC Sections 323, 341, and 34 (voluntarily causing hurt, wrongful restraint, and common intention) but acquitted them under Sections 336 and 34 (act endangering life). The accused were convicted of assaulting the complainant and his brother Chander on 13.09.2015 with sticks and stones, causing injuries, but insufficient evidence established rash or negligent endangerment. Both were sentenced to 3 months simple imprisonment and ₹200 fine each with 7 days additional imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts