State vs Jaysinhg Advocate - Sh. Khyali Ram Gurjar — 2226/2015

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 148,149,323,341,336,325. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.reg. - Cr.Regular

CNR: RJAL230005412015

Filing Number

1060/2015

Filing Date

17-Oct-2015

Registration No

2226/2015

Registration Date

17-Oct-2015

Court

CJ JM Thanagazi

Judge

2-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Sentenced

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 148,149,323,341,336,325

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaysinhg Advocate - Sh. Khyali Ram Gurjar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 2226/2015 The court convicted five accused (Jaysingh, Kishan, Shyodan, Sardar Singh, and Jayram) of rioting with deadly weapons and voluntarily causing hurt under IPC Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 336, and 325. The petitioner-victim Ghassiram reported a group attack on September 13, 2015, in which the accused assaulted him and his daughter Rambaai with lathis, stones, and other weapons, causing injuries. The court found the prosecution's eyewitness testimony (including the victim and injured family members) credible and consistent with medical evidence of injuries sustained within 2-3 hours of the incident. Jaysingh was acquitted of Section 148 charges due to insufficient proof of active participation in an unlawful assembly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 13-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 29-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 01-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 09-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 01-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 25-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 22-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 20-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 01-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 13-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 24-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 13-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 18-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 22-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 06-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 29-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  34. 20-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  35. 12-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  36. 11-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  37. 17-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  38. 06-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  39. 11-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  40. 11-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  41. 24-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  42. 23-Aug-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  43. 01-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  44. 23-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  45. 16-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  46. 09-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  47. 14-Sep-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  48. 18-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  49. 30-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  50. 21-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  51. 27-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  52. 22-Oct-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  53. 10-Jul-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  54. 04-Apr-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  55. 16-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  56. 20-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  57. 07-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  58. 14-May-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  59. 05-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  60. 27-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  61. 30-Aug-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  62. 05-Jun-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  63. 06-Mar-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  64. 08-Dec-2016

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  65. 15-Sep-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  66. 06-Aug-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  67. 14-Jun-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  68. 03-Mar-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  69. 18-Feb-2016

    Charge

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  70. 11-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 17-Oct-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2226/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 2226/2015 The court convicted five accused (Jaysingh, Kishan, Shyodan, Sardar Singh, and Jayram) of rioting with deadly weapons and voluntarily causing hurt under IPC Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 336, and 325. The petitioner-victim Ghassiram reported a group attack on September 13, 2015, in which the accused assaulted him and his daughter Rambaai with lathis, stones, and other weapons, causing injuries. The court found the prosecution's eyewitness testimony (including the victim and injured family members) credible and consistent with medical evidence of injuries sustained within 2-3 hours of the incident. Jaysingh was acquitted of Section 148 charges due to insufficient proof of active participation in an unlawful assembly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case