State Govt. vs Mehar Singh Advocate - Sh. Krishan Kumar Sharma — 2509/2016

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 323,341,451,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.reg. - Cr.Regular

CNR: RJAL230003132016

Filing Number

1503/2016

Filing Date

21-Nov-2016

Registration No

2509/2016

Registration Date

21-Nov-2016

Court

CJ JM Thanagazi

Judge

1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 323,341,451,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Govt.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mehar Singh Advocate - Sh. Krishan Kumar Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 2509/2016 Court Decision: The accused, Mehar Singh and Ramottar (Lalaram), were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 451, and 34 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed house trespass and assault on the night of September 10, 2016. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's FIR and medical evidence of injuries to family members, the court found critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies. Witnesses could not identify all perpetrators, were uncertain about the incident date/time due to darkness, and provided conflicting accounts. The court concluded the prosecution's evidence was circumstantial and could not conclusively establish the accused's guilt with certainty required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  15. 03-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  16. 15-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  20. 12-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  22. 22-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  23. 24-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  24. 30-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  25. 22-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  26. 23-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  27. 23-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  28. 12-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  29. 16-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  30. 05-Jul-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  31. 30-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  32. 15-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  33. 22-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  34. 30-Jun-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  35. 30-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  36. 14-Dec-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  37. 24-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  38. 21-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  39. 08-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  40. 07-Jan-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  41. 18-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  42. 16-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  43. 13-Feb-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  44. 14-Nov-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  45. 08-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  46. 29-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  47. 14-Jul-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  48. 24-May-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  49. 08-Mar-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  50. 20-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  51. 22-Aug-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  52. 25-Jul-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  53. 10-May-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  54. 08-Feb-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 21-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2509/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2509/2016 Court Decision: The accused, Mehar Singh and Ramottar (Lalaram), were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 323, 341, 451, and 34 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed house trespass and assault on the night of September 10, 2016. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's FIR and medical evidence of injuries to family members, the court found critical inconsistencies in witness testimonies. Witnesses could not identify all perpetrators, were uncertain about the incident date/time due to darkness, and provided conflicting accounts. The court concluded the prosecution's evidence was circumstantial and could not conclusively establish the accused's guilt with certainty required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case