DHAPA DEVI vs State Government Advocate - APP — 33/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--Final Report on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJAL230002292017

Filing Number

155/2017

Filing Date

20-Apr-2017

Registration No

33/2017

Registration Date

20-Apr-2017

Court

CJ JM Thanagazi

Judge

1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Final Report

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,471,120B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHAPA DEVI

    Adv. Sh. Pushpendra Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court found that petitioner Dhapa Devi's protest petition raised valid concerns regarding fraudulent property transfer proceedings involving deceased Prabhat's agricultural land in village Angari. The investigation officer's final report rejecting the FIR was set aside after the court determined that discrepancies in death certificates (showing death dates of 1997, 1985, and 2001), false affidavits, and improper land registration constituted prima facie evidence of offenses under IPC sections 420, 467, 471, and 120B. The court directed the police to lodge and proceed with the FIR against the accused parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  6. 24-Oct-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  7. 27-Aug-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  8. 28-Apr-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Dec-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  10. 15-Oct-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Jul-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  12. 23-Apr-2024

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  13. 15-Feb-2024

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  14. 30-Nov-2023

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  15. 18-Oct-2023

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  16. 31-Aug-2023

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  17. 01-Jun-2023

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  18. 13-Apr-2023

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  19. 02-Feb-2023

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  20. 10-Nov-2022

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  21. 28-Jun-2022

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Mar-2022

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  23. 30-Nov-2021

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  24. 24-Aug-2021

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  25. 23-Aug-2021

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  26. 20-Aug-2021

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  27. 31-May-2021

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  28. 09-Mar-2021

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  29. 23-Nov-2020

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  30. 20-Jul-2020

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  31. 07-Apr-2020

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  32. 16-Jan-2020

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  33. 24-Sep-2019

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  34. 24-Jun-2019

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  35. 04-Apr-2019

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  36. 18-Dec-2018

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  37. 13-Sep-2018

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  38. 10-Jul-2018

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  39. 31-May-2018

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  40. 17-Apr-2018

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

  41. 08-Feb-2018

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  42. 14-Nov-2017

    Recording pre-trial statements/ evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  43. 26-Sep-2017

    For examination of witnesses

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  44. 17-Jul-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  45. 08-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 20-Apr-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The court found that petitioner Dhapa Devi's protest petition raised valid concerns regarding fraudulent property transfer proceedings involving deceased Prabhat's agricultural land in village Angari. The investigation officer's final report rejecting the FIR was set aside after the court determined that discrepancies in death certificates (showing death dates of 1997, 1985, and 2001), false affidavits, and improper land registration constituted prima facie evidence of offenses under IPC sections 420, 467, 471, and 120B. The court directed the police to lodge and proceed with the FIR against the accused parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case