DHAPA DEVI vs State Government Advocate - APP — 33/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--Final Report on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJAL230002292017
Filing Number
155/2017
Filing Date
20-04-2017
Registration No
33/2017
Registration Date
20-04-2017
Court
CJ JM Thanagazi
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Final Report
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHAPA DEVI
Adv. Sh. Pushpendra Sharma
Respondent(s)
State Government Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 28-11-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 24-10-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 27-08-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court found that petitioner Dhapa Devi's protest petition raised valid concerns regarding fraudulent property transfer proceedings involving deceased Prabhat's agricultural land in village Angari. The investigation officer's final report rejecting the FIR was set aside after the court determined that discrepancies in death certificates (showing death dates of 1997, 1985, and 2001), false affidavits, and improper land registration constituted prima facie evidence of offenses under IPC sections 420, 467, 471, and 120B. The court directed the police to lodge and proceed with the FIR against the accused parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found that petitioner Dhapa Devi's protest petition raised valid concerns regarding fraudulent property transfer proceedings involving deceased Prabhat's agricultural land in village Angari. The investigation officer's final report rejecting the FIR was set aside after the court determined that discrepancies in death certificates (showing death dates of 1997, 1985, and 2001), false affidavits, and improper land registration constituted prima facie evidence of offenses under IPC sections 420, 467, 471, and 120B. The court directed the police to lodge and proceed with the FIR against the accused parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts