MUKHARAM vs STATE GOVERNMENT Advocate - APP — 44/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Final Report on 16th March 2026.
Final Report - FR
CNR: RJAL230001902019
Filing Number
190/2019
Filing Date
24-04-2019
Registration No
44/2019
Registration Date
24-04-2019
Court
CJ JM Thanagazi
Judge
1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Final Report
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
SHAHAJAHANPUR
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKHARAM
Adv. Sh. Naresh Kumar Sharma
Respondent(s)
STATE GOVERNMENT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 24-11-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 17-07-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 16-04-2025 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Mukharam v. State Government (44/2019) Decision (16.03.2026): The court dismissed the petitioner's protest petition challenging the FIR filed under IPC Sections 279 and 337. The court found the investigation officer's conclusion credible—that a bus (Reg. No. ARJ 02 PA 5054) struck the petitioner's son on 04.03.2019, fracturing his leg. Despite the petitioner's claims that police colluded with witnesses and falsified evidence, the court determined the investigation was properly conducted and witness statements were reliable. The FIR was upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mukharam v. State Government (44/2019) Decision (16.03.2026): The court dismissed the petitioner's protest petition challenging the FIR filed under IPC Sections 279 and 337. The court found the investigation officer's conclusion credible—that a bus (Reg. No. ARJ 02 PA 5054) struck the petitioner's son on 04.03.2019, fracturing his leg. Despite the petitioner's claims that police colluded with witnesses and falsified evidence, the court determined the investigation was properly conducted and witness statements were reliable. The FIR was upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts