MUKHARAM vs STATE GOVERNMENT Advocate - APP — 44/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Final Report on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Final Report - FR

CNR: RJAL230001902019

Filing Number

190/2019

Filing Date

24-Apr-2019

Registration No

44/2019

Registration Date

24-Apr-2019

Court

CJ JM Thanagazi

Judge

1-Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Final Report

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

SHAHAJAHANPUR

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKHARAM

    Adv. Sh. Naresh Kumar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE GOVERNMENT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Mukharam v. State Government (44/2019) Decision (16.03.2026): The court dismissed the petitioner's protest petition challenging the FIR filed under IPC Sections 279 and 337. The court found the investigation officer's conclusion credible—that a bus (Reg. No. ARJ 02 PA 5054) struck the petitioner's son on 04.03.2019, fracturing his leg. Despite the petitioner's claims that police colluded with witnesses and falsified evidence, the court determined the investigation was properly conducted and witness statements were reliable. The FIR was upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  5. 24-Nov-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  6. 17-Jul-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Apr-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  8. 24-Jan-2025

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  9. 12-Nov-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  10. 07-Sep-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  11. 12-Aug-2024

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  12. 18-Mar-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  13. 11-Dec-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  14. 18-Oct-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  15. 23-Aug-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  16. 13-Mar-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  17. 07-Dec-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  18. 20-Jul-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  19. 31-May-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  20. 09-Feb-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  21. 23-Sep-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  22. 29-Jun-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  23. 05-Apr-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  24. 18-Jan-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  25. 31-Aug-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  26. 11-May-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  27. 26-Mar-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  28. 17-Feb-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  29. 11-Dec-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  30. 11-Nov-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Sep-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  32. 02-Sep-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  33. 05-Aug-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  34. 01-Jul-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate

  35. 28-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 24-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mukharam v. State Government (44/2019) Decision (16.03.2026): The court dismissed the petitioner's protest petition challenging the FIR filed under IPC Sections 279 and 337. The court found the investigation officer's conclusion credible—that a bus (Reg. No. ARJ 02 PA 5054) struck the petitioner's son on 04.03.2019, fracturing his leg. Despite the petitioner's claims that police colluded with witnesses and falsified evidence, the court determined the investigation was properly conducted and witness statements were reliable. The FIR was upheld as legally valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case