Aasam vs State — 11/2018
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section Appeal. Disposed: Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Allowed on 27th March 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJAL190002062018
Filing Number
60/2018
Filing Date
19-May-2018
Registration No
11/2018
Registration Date
19-May-2018
Court
ADJ Laxmangarh
Judge
1-ADJ, Laxmangarh
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Appeal Allowed, Cross Objection Allowed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aasam
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Aasam v. State (11/2018) The High Court of Rajasthan acquitted Aasam Khan of charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty), finding the prosecution case failed to meet the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical inconsistencies in the complainant's FIR and testimony—her account varied significantly between the written complaint and oral statements regarding the sequence of alleged assault. Key witnesses either contradicted the prosecution narrative or had credibility issues due to family ties to the complainant. Additionally, the FIR was filed with unexplained delay, no torn clothing was seized despite being described, and no medical evidence corroborated injuries allegedly sustained. The court concluded the lower court erred in convicting based on incomplete evidence analysis and improper reliance on a single witness's unsupported testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
24-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
16-Mar-2026
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
27-Feb-2026
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
16-Jan-2026
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
04-Dec-2025
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
25-Sep-2025
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
22-Aug-2025
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
20-Jun-2025
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
08-May-2025
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
24-Feb-2025
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
13-Dec-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
18-Oct-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
29-Aug-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
30-Jul-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
07-Jun-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
18-Apr-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
31-Jan-2024
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
04-Dec-2023
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
21-Oct-2023
Final arguments
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
16-Sep-2023
Appearance of accused
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
04-Aug-2023
Appearance of accused
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
01-Jul-2023
Appearance of accused
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
12-May-2023
Appearance of accused
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
10-Feb-2023
Appearance of accused
ADJ, Laxmangarh
-
23-Dec-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
15-Nov-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
13-Oct-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
12-Aug-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
08-Jul-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
22-Apr-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
24-Feb-2022
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
13-Dec-2021
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
16-Jul-2021
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
04-May-2021
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
26-Feb-2021
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
12-Feb-2021
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
09-Jan-2021
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
31-Oct-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
25-Sep-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
07-Aug-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
26-Jun-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
28-Apr-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
24-Mar-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
10-Jan-2020
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
11-Nov-2019
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
01-Oct-2019
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
30-Jul-2019
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
07-Jun-2019
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
28-Mar-2019
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
11-Feb-2019
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
12-Dec-2018
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
13-Sep-2018
Appearance of accused
Additional District and Sessions Judge Laxmangarh
-
05-Jun-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2018
Case Summary: Aasam v. State (11/2018) The High Court of Rajasthan acquitted Aasam Khan of charges under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty), finding the prosecution case failed to meet the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical inconsistencies in the complainant's FIR and testimony—her account varied significantly between the written complaint and oral statements regarding the sequence of alleged assault. Key witnesses either contradicted the prosecution narrative or had credibility issues due to family ties to the complainant. Additionally, the FIR was filed with unexplained delay, no torn clothing was seized despite being described, and no medical evidence corroborated injuries allegedly sustained. The court concluded the lower court erred in convicting based on incomplete evidence analysis and improper reliance on a single witness's unsupported testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts