State vs Lekhram — 23/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 182,211. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJAL190001932018
Filing Number
47/2018
Filing Date
18-05-2018
Registration No
23/2018
Registration Date
18-05-2018
Court
ADJ Laxmangarh
Judge
1-ADJ, Laxmangarh
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Respondent(s)
Lekhram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ, Laxmangarh
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Lekhram (23/2018) The court acquitted the accused Lekhram of charges under IPC Sections 182 and 211. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Lekhram filed a false complaint against Indra regarding alleged sexual assault. Key evidentiary gaps included: no police call detail records or documentary proof placing Indra at the crime scene on the alleged date (16.05.2014), inconsistent witness testimonies regarding the crime date and Indra's whereabouts, and absence of credible corroboration for the false FIR allegation. The court found the accused entitled to benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Lekhram (23/2018) The court acquitted the accused Lekhram of charges under IPC Sections 182 and 211. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Lekhram filed a false complaint against Indra regarding alleged sexual assault. Key evidentiary gaps included: no police call detail records or documentary proof placing Indra at the crime scene on the alleged date (16.05.2014), inconsistent witness testimonies regarding the crime date and Indra's whereabouts, and absence of credible corroboration for the false FIR allegation. The court found the accused entitled to benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts