tarachand vs State — 3/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJAL190001562026

Filing Number

76/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Laxmangarh

Judge

1-ADJ, Laxmangarh

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.tarachand

    Adv. SH.ARUN KUMAR JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court granted interim custody of vehicle registration number RJ-05 YUC 0328 to petitioner Tarachand on bail. The petitioner, whose vehicle was seized as evidence in an ongoing criminal case (FIR 413/2022) under IPC sections 497 and 503, requested return of the vehicle on supurdari (custody). The court found the petitioner's need for the vehicle legitimate and ordered its release on interim bail with a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and an undertaking that the vehicle would not be moved, modified, or concealed during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Report

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted interim custody of vehicle registration number RJ-05 YUC 0328 to petitioner Tarachand on bail. The petitioner, whose vehicle was seized as evidence in an ongoing criminal case (FIR 413/2022) under IPC sections 497 and 503, requested return of the vehicle on supurdari (custody). The court found the petitioner's need for the vehicle legitimate and ordered its release on interim bail with a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and an undertaking that the vehicle would not be moved, modified, or concealed during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case