lakhvindar singh vs State — 57/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL190001542026

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

57/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Laxmangarh

Judge

1-ADJ, Laxmangarh

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Aabkari Circle Laxmangarh

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.lakhvindar singh

    Adv. SH.NITIN JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Lakhvindar Singh v. State (CIS 57/2026) The court granted bail to Lakhvindar Singh, who was arrested on 25 February 2026 for allegedly possessing 55 liters of illicit liquor under the Rajasthan Excise Act (Sections 16/54, 54-K). The court found that while serious charges existed, the accused had been in judicial custody for approximately 20 days, no prior conviction record was established, and investigation/trial would take considerable time. Bail was approved on condition of ₹50,000 security with personal surety, requiring the accused to appear before the magistrate at each hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Lakhvindar Singh v. State (CIS 57/2026) The court granted bail to Lakhvindar Singh, who was arrested on 25 February 2026 for allegedly possessing 55 liters of illicit liquor under the Rajasthan Excise Act (Sections 16/54, 54-K). The court found that while serious charges existed, the accused had been in judicial custody for approximately 20 days, no prior conviction record was established, and investigation/trial would take considerable time. Bail was approved on condition of ₹50,000 security with personal surety, requiring the accused to appear before the magistrate at each hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case