bhagsingh vs State — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL190001522026

Filing Number

72/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Laxmangarh

Judge

1-ADJ, Laxmangarh

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

LAXMANGARH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.bhagsingh

    Adv. SH. GHANSHYAM CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 55/2026 - Bhagsingh v. State The court granted bail to 22-year-old Bhagsingh Meena, accused of cybercrime and cheating offenses (IPC §316(2), §318(4), and IT Act §66D), involving online hotel booking fraud via WhatsApp accounts. The court imposed bail conditions requiring two sureties of ₹25,000 each and personal bond of ₹50,000, finding the accused to be a first-year B.Sc. student with incomplete investigation and limited evidence beyond recovered mobile phones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Report

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Report

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Report

    ADJ, Laxmangarh

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 55/2026 - Bhagsingh v. State The court granted bail to 22-year-old Bhagsingh Meena, accused of cybercrime and cheating offenses (IPC §316(2), §318(4), and IT Act §66D), involving online hotel booking fraud via WhatsApp accounts. The court imposed bail conditions requiring two sureties of ₹25,000 each and personal bond of ₹50,000, finding the accused to be a first-year B.Sc. student with incomplete investigation and limited evidence beyond recovered mobile phones. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case