State vs Chhoti devi etc — 799/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 28th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL160017372025
Filing Number
1729/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
799/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Court
ACJM JM Rajgarh
Judge
2-Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
688
Police Station
RAJGARH
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. RISHI RAJ CHAIRWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chhoti devi etc
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Chhoti Devi (Case 799/2025) Decision Date: 28 March 2026 The court acquitted all six accused persons (Chhoti Devi, Kailashchand, Lakshmi Devi, Maya Devi, Kamal, and Rishiraj) of serious charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, and 149 (rioting offenses) due to insufficient evidence proving the participation of five or more persons required for these provisions. The accused were convicted only on lesser charges under Sections 323/149, 341/149, and 325/149 IPC (simple hurt and wrongful restraint), with benefit of doubt applied to riot-related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
-
16-Mar-2026
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
-
06-Mar-2026
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
-
04-Feb-2026
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
-
22-Jan-2026
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
-
15-Jan-2026
Framing of Charge/ Plea
Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 799/2025
Case Summary: State v. Chhoti Devi (Case 799/2025) Decision Date: 28 March 2026 The court acquitted all six accused persons (Chhoti Devi, Kailashchand, Lakshmi Devi, Maya Devi, Kamal, and Rishiraj) of serious charges under IPC Sections 147, 148, and 149 (rioting offenses) due to insufficient evidence proving the participation of five or more persons required for these provisions. The accused were convicted only on lesser charges under Sections 323/149, 341/149, and 325/149 IPC (simple hurt and wrongful restraint), with benefit of doubt applied to riot-related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts