State vs KAMAL — 522/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL160010052017

Filing Number

990/2017

Filing Date

02-May-2016

Registration No

522/2017

Registration Date

02-May-2016

Court

ACJM JM Rajgarh

Judge

3-Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

RAJGARH

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Kamal (Case 522/2017) The court acquitted the accused, Kamal Singh, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 304A in a fatal vehicular collision case. Though evidence established that a truck (Registration No. ARJ 02 JP 5198) struck a car on January 26, 2016, causing three deaths, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused operated the truck recklessly or with criminal negligence. The sole eyewitness (the car owner) could not identify the truck driver, and no other witness directly observed the collision mechanics or the driver's conduct, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  13. 17-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  14. 02-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  18. 04-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  21. 22-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  22. 20-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  23. 17-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  24. 10-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  25. 18-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  26. 28-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  27. 08-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  28. 11-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  29. 17-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  30. 19-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  31. 16-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  32. 22-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  33. 29-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  34. 06-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  35. 18-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  36. 11-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  37. 04-Jun-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  38. 10-Nov-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  39. 20-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  40. 21-Apr-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  41. 20-Nov-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  42. 03-Jul-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  43. 19-Feb-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  44. 05-Oct-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  45. 19-May-2018

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  46. 16-Dec-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 02-May-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 522/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Kamal (Case 522/2017) The court acquitted the accused, Kamal Singh, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 304A in a fatal vehicular collision case. Though evidence established that a truck (Registration No. ARJ 02 JP 5198) struck a car on January 26, 2016, causing three deaths, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused operated the truck recklessly or with criminal negligence. The sole eyewitness (the car owner) could not identify the truck driver, and no other witness directly observed the collision mechanics or the driver's conduct, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case