STATE vs VIKRAM URF BIKA — 468/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 16th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL160009662024
Filing Number
954/2024
Filing Date
02-07-2024
Registration No
468/2024
Registration Date
08-07-2024
Court
ACJM JM Rajgarh
Judge
2-CJ (SD) ACJM, Rajgarh
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation
FIR Details
FIR Number
166
Police Station
RAJGARH
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
VIKRAM URF BIKA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CJ (SD) ACJM, Rajgarh
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 04-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 468/2024 State v. Vikram URF Bika Court Decision (16.03.2026): The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Vikram URF Bika of charges under IPC Section 341 (wrongful restraint) due to insufficient evidence, but convicted him under Section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt). The court found that while Vikram assaulted complainant Jayram with a lathi (stick), causing injuries to his hand and neck, evidence of intentional wrongful confinement was lacking. Vikram was sentenced to probation under the Probation Act with a bond of ₹10,000 and ordered to pay ₹500 prosecution costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 468/2024 State v. Vikram URF Bika Court Decision (16.03.2026): The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Vikram URF Bika of charges under IPC Section 341 (wrongful restraint) due to insufficient evidence, but convicted him under Section 323 (voluntarily causing hurt). The court found that while Vikram assaulted complainant Jayram with a lathi (stick), causing injuries to his hand and neck, evidence of intentional wrongful confinement was lacking. Vikram was sentenced to probation under the Probation Act with a bond of ₹10,000 and ordered to pay ₹500 prosecution costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts