State vs KAMRUDIN Advocate - GANGAPRASAD — 432/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL160008652017
Filing Number
850/2017
Filing Date
01-03-2016
Registration No
432/2017
Registration Date
01-03-2016
Court
ACJM JM Rajgarh
Judge
3-CJ (JD) JM, Rajgarh
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
RAJGARH
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KAMRUDIN Advocate - GANGAPRASAD
Hearing History
Judge: 3-CJ (JD) JM, Rajgarh
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 09-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Kamrudin (Case 432/2017) Court Decision (dated 06.04.2026): The court acquitted accused Kamrudin of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Kamrudin was driving the truck (Rajasthan 29 JF 0692) that collided with the petitioner's motorcycle on 04.01.2016, causing injuries to two girls. No eyewitness identified the truck driver, and the defense relied on the principle that the accused must be proven guilty as the actual driver, not merely assumed. The court found insufficient evidence to prove Kamrudin was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Kamrudin (Case 432/2017) Court Decision (dated 06.04.2026): The court acquitted accused Kamrudin of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Kamrudin was driving the truck (Rajasthan 29 JF 0692) that collided with the petitioner's motorcycle on 04.01.2016, causing injuries to two girls. No eyewitness identified the truck driver, and the defense relied on the principle that the accused must be proven guilty as the actual driver, not merely assumed. The court found insufficient evidence to prove Kamrudin was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts