State vs KAMRUDIN Advocate - GANGAPRASAD — 432/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL160008652017

Filing Number

850/2017

Filing Date

01-Mar-2016

Registration No

432/2017

Registration Date

01-Mar-2016

Court

ACJM JM Rajgarh

Judge

3-Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

RAJGARH

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMRUDIN Advocate - GANGAPRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Kamrudin (Case 432/2017) Court Decision (dated 06.04.2026): The court acquitted accused Kamrudin of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Kamrudin was driving the truck (Rajasthan 29 JF 0692) that collided with the petitioner's motorcycle on 04.01.2016, causing injuries to two girls. No eyewitness identified the truck driver, and the defense relied on the principle that the accused must be proven guilty as the actual driver, not merely assumed. The court found insufficient evidence to prove Kamrudin was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  13. 21-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  14. 12-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  16. 10-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  17. 12-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  18. 23-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  19. 06-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  20. 25-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  21. 01-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  22. 03-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  23. 31-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  24. 22-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  25. 19-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  26. 26-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  27. 28-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  28. 27-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  29. 13-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  30. 14-Jun-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  31. 25-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  32. 09-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  33. 22-Apr-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  34. 05-Nov-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  35. 16-Jun-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  36. 16-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  37. 28-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  38. 29-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  39. 10-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  40. 06-Oct-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  41. 19-May-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Jd) Jm, Rajgarh

  42. 12-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 01-Mar-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 432/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Kamrudin (Case 432/2017) Court Decision (dated 06.04.2026): The court acquitted accused Kamrudin of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt). The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that Kamrudin was driving the truck (Rajasthan 29 JF 0692) that collided with the petitioner's motorcycle on 04.01.2016, causing injuries to two girls. No eyewitness identified the truck driver, and the defense relied on the principle that the accused must be proven guilty as the actual driver, not merely assumed. The court found insufficient evidence to prove Kamrudin was operating the vehicle at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case