STATE vs MAHENDRA Advocate - ALKA SAINI — 354/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL160007282022

Case disposed

Filing Number

724/2022

Filing Date

27-07-2022

Registration No

354/2022

Registration Date

27-07-2022

Court

ACJM JM Rajgarh

Judge

3-CJ (JD) JM, Rajgarh

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

TEHLA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

MAHENDRA Advocate - ALKA SAINI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-CJ (JD) JM, Rajgarh

16-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Final arguments

09-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

28-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

16-01-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Mahendra Kumar (Case 354/2022) Court Decision (16 March 2026): The Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate of Rajgarh, Alwar acquitted defendant Mahendra Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. All prosecution witnesses, including eyewitnesses to a fatal motorcycle collision on 25 January 2022, contradicted the narrative or could not identify the accused vehicle/driver. The defendant was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Mahendra Kumar (Case 354/2022) Court Decision (16 March 2026): The Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate of Rajgarh, Alwar acquitted defendant Mahendra Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. All prosecution witnesses, including eyewitnesses to a fatal motorcycle collision on 25 January 2022, contradicted the narrative or could not identify the accused vehicle/driver. The defendant was acquitted and released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM Rajgarh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case