State vs BALRAM Advocate - BHAGWATI PRASAD MEENA — 277/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,324. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL160005812024

Filing Number

573/2024

Filing Date

22-Apr-2024

Registration No

277/2024

Registration Date

25-Apr-2024

Court

ACJM JM Rajgarh

Judge

2-Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Convicted and Released on Probation

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

311

Police Station

RAJGARH

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,341,324

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BALRAM Advocate - BHAGWATI PRASAD MEENA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Balram (Case 277/2024) Decision (March 16, 2026) The court convicted defendant Balram (son of Sultan Meena) of assault and wrongful restraint under IPC Sections 323 and 341, but acquitted him under Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt with dangerous weapon). The court found credible eyewitness testimony from the complainant (reporter Ramswaroop) and corroborating witness (Sitaram) establishing that Balram, along with 4-5 others, assaulted and unlawfully restrained the reporter on June 16, 2023. However, medical evidence and witness statements regarding the nature and weapon of injuries were inconsistent regarding serious/dangerous wounds, warranting benefit of doubt under Section 324. Given Balram's first offense with no prior criminal history, the court imposed probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for 2 years with a self-bond of ₹10,000 and ₹800 prosecution cost, rather than imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  11. 10-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  12. 21-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  13. 25-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  14. 11-Nov-2024

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  15. 12-Sep-2024

    Framing of Charge/ Plea

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  16. 06-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 22-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 277/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Balram (Case 277/2024) Decision (March 16, 2026) The court convicted defendant Balram (son of Sultan Meena) of assault and wrongful restraint under IPC Sections 323 and 341, but acquitted him under Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt with dangerous weapon). The court found credible eyewitness testimony from the complainant (reporter Ramswaroop) and corroborating witness (Sitaram) establishing that Balram, along with 4-5 others, assaulted and unlawfully restrained the reporter on June 16, 2023. However, medical evidence and witness statements regarding the nature and weapon of injuries were inconsistent regarding serious/dangerous wounds, warranting benefit of doubt under Section 324. Given Balram's first offense with no prior criminal history, the court imposed probation under the Probation of Offenders Act for 2 years with a self-bond of ₹10,000 and ₹800 prosecution cost, rather than imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case