State vs UGENDER SINGH Advocate - KAILASH CHAND BHARADWAJ — 358/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAL160005602021
Filing Number
560/2021
Filing Date
25-03-2021
Registration No
358/2021
Registration Date
25-03-2021
Court
ACJM JM Rajgarh
Judge
6-ACJ and JM Rajgarh
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
RAJGARH
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
UGENDER SINGH Advocate - KAILASH CHAND BHARADWAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ACJ and JM Rajgarh
Disposed
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Ugendra Singh (Case 358/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Ugendra Singh, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle involved in the fatal accident that resulted in the death of Ramlal on January 3, 2021. Key Reasoning: Although the victim's companion (PW-2) identified the offending truck number (Raj-02 GC 0176) and described rash driving, no eye-witness could positively identify the accused as the actual driver of that vehicle. The vehicle owner was not examined, and critical evidence linking the accused to the vehicle was circumstantial. The court applied the benefit of doubt principle, observing that no direct witness testimony established the accused's identity as the driver, making conviction impossible under criminal law standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Ugendra Singh (Case 358/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Ugendra Singh, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle involved in the fatal accident that resulted in the death of Ramlal on January 3, 2021. Key Reasoning: Although the victim's companion (PW-2) identified the offending truck number (Raj-02 GC 0176) and described rash driving, no eye-witness could positively identify the accused as the actual driver of that vehicle. The vehicle owner was not examined, and critical evidence linking the accused to the vehicle was circumstantial. The court applied the benefit of doubt principle, observing that no direct witness testimony established the accused's identity as the driver, making conviction impossible under criminal law standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts