State vs UGENDER SINGH Advocate - KAILASH CHAND BHARADWAJ — 358/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL160005602021

Case disposed

Filing Number

560/2021

Filing Date

25-03-2021

Registration No

358/2021

Registration Date

25-03-2021

Court

ACJM JM Rajgarh

Judge

6-ACJ and JM Rajgarh

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

RAJGARH

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

UGENDER SINGH Advocate - KAILASH CHAND BHARADWAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 6-ACJ and JM Rajgarh

04-05-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Defence Evidence

08-04-2026

Defence Evidence

16-03-2026

Defence Evidence

19-02-2026

Defence Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Ugendra Singh (Case 358/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Ugendra Singh, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle involved in the fatal accident that resulted in the death of Ramlal on January 3, 2021. Key Reasoning: Although the victim's companion (PW-2) identified the offending truck number (Raj-02 GC 0176) and described rash driving, no eye-witness could positively identify the accused as the actual driver of that vehicle. The vehicle owner was not examined, and critical evidence linking the accused to the vehicle was circumstantial. The court applied the benefit of doubt principle, observing that no direct witness testimony established the accused's identity as the driver, making conviction impossible under criminal law standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Ugendra Singh (Case 358/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Ugendra Singh, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle involved in the fatal accident that resulted in the death of Ramlal on January 3, 2021. Key Reasoning: Although the victim's companion (PW-2) identified the offending truck number (Raj-02 GC 0176) and described rash driving, no eye-witness could positively identify the accused as the actual driver of that vehicle. The vehicle owner was not examined, and critical evidence linking the accused to the vehicle was circumstantial. The court applied the benefit of doubt principle, observing that no direct witness testimony established the accused's identity as the driver, making conviction impossible under criminal law standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM Rajgarh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case