State vs UGENDER SINGH Advocate - KAILASH CHAND BHARADWAJ — 358/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAL160005602021

Filing Number

560/2021

Filing Date

25-Mar-2021

Registration No

358/2021

Registration Date

25-Mar-2021

Court

ACJM JM Rajgarh

Judge

6-Acj and Jm Rajgarh

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

RAJGARH

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UGENDER SINGH Advocate - KAILASH CHAND BHARADWAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Ugendra Singh (Case 358/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Ugendra Singh, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle involved in the fatal accident that resulted in the death of Ramlal on January 3, 2021. Key Reasoning: Although the victim's companion (PW-2) identified the offending truck number (Raj-02 GC 0176) and described rash driving, no eye-witness could positively identify the accused as the actual driver of that vehicle. The vehicle owner was not examined, and critical evidence linking the accused to the vehicle was circumstantial. The court applied the benefit of doubt principle, observing that no direct witness testimony established the accused's identity as the driver, making conviction impossible under criminal law standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  12. 15-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  13. 27-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  14. 13-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  15. 30-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  16. 09-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  19. 25-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  20. 18-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  21. 24-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  22. 12-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  23. 11-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  24. 01-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  25. 20-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  26. 02-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  27. 02-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  28. 07-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  29. 12-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  30. 27-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  31. 03-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  32. 05-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  33. 05-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  34. 05-Jun-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  35. 06-May-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  36. 10-Mar-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Acj and Jm Rajgarh

  37. 01-Mar-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  38. 25-Aug-2022

    Restored

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  39. 25-Aug-2022

    Disposed

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  40. 14-Mar-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  41. 25-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Cj (Sd) Acjm, Rajgarh

  42. 06-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 25-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 358/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Ugendra Singh (Case 358/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Ugendra Singh, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279 and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing death). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the driver of the vehicle involved in the fatal accident that resulted in the death of Ramlal on January 3, 2021. Key Reasoning: Although the victim's companion (PW-2) identified the offending truck number (Raj-02 GC 0176) and described rash driving, no eye-witness could positively identify the accused as the actual driver of that vehicle. The vehicle owner was not examined, and critical evidence linking the accused to the vehicle was circumstantial. The court applied the benefit of doubt principle, observing that no direct witness testimony established the accused's identity as the driver, making conviction impossible under criminal law standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case