PHOOLCHAND vs BENIPRASAD — 23/2024

Case under Civil Code Procedure Section APPEAL. Disposed: Contested--Remanded on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJAL150005512024

Filing Number

260/2024

Filing Date

04-Sep-2024

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

04-Sep-2024

Court

ADJ Rajgarh

Judge

1-ADJ Rajgarh

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Remanded

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Code Procedure Section APPEAL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PHOOLCHAND

    Adv. AJAY NIDANIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BENIPRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary of Case 23/2024: Phoolchand v. Beniprasad Decision (May 7, 2026): The Additional District Judge set aside the lower court's order dated March 22, 2024, finding it violated procedural law and lacked proper evidentiary basis. The court determined that the lower court erroneously decided issues regarding tenancy of a disputed shop, noting that a prior settlement (May 7, 2016) between the same parties on the same property should have precluded a fresh suit. The court remanded the matter with directions to adjudicate a specific issue: whether the tenant completed repairs by June 1, 2016, thereby entitling him to increased rent of ₹1,000/month from June 1, 2016, instead of the previously determined ₹425/month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Rajgarh

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  14. 01-Sep-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  15. 09-Jul-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  16. 07-May-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  17. 22-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  18. 01-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  19. 24-Mar-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  20. 06-Jan-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  22. 25-Nov-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  23. 11-Nov-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  24. 15-Oct-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  25. 30-Sep-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  26. 17-Sep-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  27. 09-Sep-2024

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    ADJ Rajgarh

  28. 05-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 04-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 23/2024: Phoolchand v. Beniprasad Decision (May 7, 2026): The Additional District Judge set aside the lower court's order dated March 22, 2024, finding it violated procedural law and lacked proper evidentiary basis. The court determined that the lower court erroneously decided issues regarding tenancy of a disputed shop, noting that a prior settlement (May 7, 2016) between the same parties on the same property should have precluded a fresh suit. The court remanded the matter with directions to adjudicate a specific issue: whether the tenant completed repairs by June 1, 2016, thereby entitling him to increased rent of ₹1,000/month from June 1, 2016, instead of the previously determined ₹425/month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case