RAMESHWAR PRASAD URF RAJU vs STATE Advocate - RAHUL DIXIT — 29/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL150001942026

Filing Number

66/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ Rajgarh

Judge

1-ADJ Rajgarh

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

87

Police Station

RAJGARH

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHWAR PRASAD URF RAJU

    Adv. RAKESH JANGID

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE Advocate - RAHUL DIXIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Rameshwar Prasad Urf Raju v. State Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rameshwar Prasad Urf Raju under Section 482 CrPC on March 17, 2026. Key Reasoning: The petitioner was accused of serious offenses under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 118(2)/49 following an FIR alleging he assaulted a minor with a blade weapon. The court found that: (1) the petitioner had four prior criminal cases with one acquittal and three pending; (2) investigation records showed the petitioner failed to cooperate and attempted to abscond; (3) granting bail without examining case merits at this stage was inappropriate. The court deemed the charges sufficiently grave to deny premature bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Rajgarh

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    ADJ Rajgarh

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rameshwar Prasad Urf Raju v. State Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rameshwar Prasad Urf Raju under Section 482 CrPC on March 17, 2026. Key Reasoning: The petitioner was accused of serious offenses under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 118(2)/49 following an FIR alleging he assaulted a minor with a blade weapon. The court found that: (1) the petitioner had four prior criminal cases with one acquittal and three pending; (2) investigation records showed the petitioner failed to cooperate and attempted to abscond; (3) granting bail without examining case merits at this stage was inappropriate. The court deemed the charges sufficiently grave to deny premature bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case