RAMESHWAR PRASAD URF RAJU vs STATE Advocate - RAHUL DIXIT — 29/2026

Case Summary: Rameshwar Prasad Urf Raju v. State Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Rameshwar Prasad Urf Raju under Section 482 CrPC on March 17, 2026. Key Reasoning: The petitioner was accused of serious offenses under IPC Sections 115(2), 126(2), and 118(2)/49 following an FIR alleging he assaulted a minor with a blade weapon. The court found that: (1) the petitioner had four prior criminal cases with one acquittal and three pending; (2) investigation records showed the petitioner failed to cooperate and attempted to abscond; (3) granting bail without examining case merits at this stage was inappropriate. The court deemed the charges sufficiently grave to deny premature bail relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.