KRAPAL vs SUKHLAL — 19/2026

Case under Civil Code Procedure Section O-41, R-5 CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJAL150001742026

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

ADJ Rajgarh

Judge

1-ADJ Rajgarh

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Code Procedure Section O-41, R-5 CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRAPAL

    Adv. SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHLAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: KRAPAL v. SUKHLAL (Case No. 19/2026) The court dismissed appellant Krapal's civil appeal against respondent Sukhlal's injunction suit regarding a disputed residential land plot. The lower court had ordered Krapal to remove unauthorized construction (2 sq ft encroachment and a boundary wall) made on Sukhlal's property within 2 months, with an injunction against further construction. The appellate court upheld this decision, finding the encroachment unlawful and rejecting Krapal's arguments that procedural delays and inadequate legal representation warranted reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Rajgarh

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Rajgarh

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Rajgarh

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Rajgarh

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    ADJ Rajgarh

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: KRAPAL v. SUKHLAL (Case No. 19/2026) The court dismissed appellant Krapal's civil appeal against respondent Sukhlal's injunction suit regarding a disputed residential land plot. The lower court had ordered Krapal to remove unauthorized construction (2 sq ft encroachment and a boundary wall) made on Sukhlal's property within 2 months, with an injunction against further construction. The appellate court upheld this decision, finding the encroachment unlawful and rejecting Krapal's arguments that procedural delays and inadequate legal representation warranted reconsideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case