ASHA DEVI vs MAHESH CHAND Advocate - SURENDRA KUMAR MATHUR — 5/2026

Case under Civil Code Procedure Section O-21, R-97. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 18th May 2026.

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJAL150000532026

Case disposed

Filing Number

32/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Court

ADJ Rajgarh

Judge

1-ADJ Rajgarh

Decision Date

18th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Civil Code Procedure Section O-21, R-97

Petitioner(s)

ASHA DEVI

Adv. MOHAN LAL JAIMAN

Respondent(s)

MAHESH CHAND Advocate - SURENDRA KUMAR MATHUR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADJ Rajgarh

18-05-2026

Disposed

04-05-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

15-04-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

10-04-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

06-04-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

18-05-2026
Order

Case Summary: Asha Devi v. Mahesh Chand Court Decision (18 May 2026): The court accepted the petitioner's application to suspend the execution decree dated 11-07-2019 and stayed the property transfer proceedings pending resolution of a related civil suit (Case 09/2019). The court held that the petitioner, as a co-heir with ancestral property rights, was entitled to challenge the property sale and that suspending execution until the main suit's determination serves judicial propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Asha Devi v. Mahesh Chand Court Decision (18 May 2026): The court accepted the petitioner's application to suspend the execution decree dated 11-07-2019 and stayed the property transfer proceedings pending resolution of a related civil suit (Case 09/2019). The court held that the petitioner, as a co-heir with ancestral property rights, was entitled to challenge the property sale and that suspending execution until the main suit's determination serves judicial propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Rajgarh All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case