HARSH VARDHAN PALAWAT vs State Advocate - APO — 352/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 380. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 20th May 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJAL010052742024
Filing Number
3830/2024
Filing Date
12-12-2024
Registration No
352/2024
Registration Date
18-12-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARSH VARDHAN PALAWAT
Adv. MADAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
SUSHIL KUMAR GARG
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-05-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed petitioner Harsh Vardhan Palawat's appeal based on a settlement reached between the parties during mediation. The court acquitted Palawat of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the trial court's conviction imposing one month imprisonment and ₹1,80,000 compensation. Per the settlement, Palawat paid ₹1,80,000 to respondent Sushil Kumar Garg through installments and lump sum payments, with ₹36,000 deposited with the court for Garg's collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed petitioner Harsh Vardhan Palawat's appeal based on a settlement reached between the parties during mediation. The court acquitted Palawat of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and set aside the trial court's conviction imposing one month imprisonment and ₹1,80,000 compensation. Per the settlement, Palawat paid ₹1,80,000 to respondent Sushil Kumar Garg through installments and lump sum payments, with ₹36,000 deposited with the court for Garg's collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts