PRAVEEN KUMARI vs State Advocate - APO — 306/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJAL010041542025

Filing Number

3147/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

306/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVEEN KUMARI

    Adv. JAGDISH CHANDRA SATIJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

  2. 2.SEEMA

  3. 3.SIRJAUDEEN

    Adv. APO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 306/2025 - Praveen Kumari v. State Advocate The District and Sessions Court, Alwar dismissed Praveen Kumari's criminal revision petition challenging an order issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ramgarh dated 25.07.2025. The lower court had imposed a one-year bond of Rs. 20,000 on the petitioner under IPC Sections 126 and 135 to maintain peace. Since the prescribed one-year bond period had already expired, the court found the petition devoid of merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 306/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 306/2025 - Praveen Kumari v. State Advocate The District and Sessions Court, Alwar dismissed Praveen Kumari's criminal revision petition challenging an order issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ramgarh dated 25.07.2025. The lower court had imposed a one-year bond of Rs. 20,000 on the petitioner under IPC Sections 126 and 135 to maintain peace. Since the prescribed one-year bond period had already expired, the court found the petition devoid of merit and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case