SANJAY KHANDELWAL vs State — 264/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed otherwise on 05th June 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJAL010039922024
Filing Number
2913/2024
Filing Date
17-09-2024
Registration No
264/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY KHANDELWAL
Adv. HEM RAJ GUPTA
Respondent(s)
State
TRILOK SAINI @ SONU
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 20-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 264/2024 (Criminal Revision) Sanjay Khandelwal v. State and Trilok Saini The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Alwar rejected the petitioner's criminal revision challenging the lower court's order dismissing his protest petition against an FIR. The court found that Khandelwal's claims of lending ₹2 lakh to Trilok Saini in 2020 and receiving a dishonored cheque in 2023 constituted a civil debt dispute, not a criminal matter. The lower court properly upheld that such monetary transactions should be resolved through civil suits, not criminal prosecution, and found no illegality in its order dated 05-07-2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 264/2024 (Criminal Revision) Sanjay Khandelwal v. State and Trilok Saini The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Alwar rejected the petitioner's criminal revision challenging the lower court's order dismissing his protest petition against an FIR. The court found that Khandelwal's claims of lending ₹2 lakh to Trilok Saini in 2020 and receiving a dishonored cheque in 2023 constituted a civil debt dispute, not a criminal matter. The lower court properly upheld that such monetary transactions should be resolved through civil suits, not criminal prosecution, and found no illegality in its order dated 05-07-2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts