MANOHARLAL SAINI vs RAJENDRA KUMAR SAINI — 327/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39.1. Disposed: Contested--Allowed otherwise on 25th April 2026.

Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)

CNR: RJAL010039812024

Case disposed

Filing Number

886/2024

Filing Date

12-09-2024

Registration No

327/2024

Registration Date

20-09-2024

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

Decision Date

25th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed otherwise

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39.1

Petitioner(s)

MANOHARLAL SAINI

Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH KUMAWAT

Respondent(s)

RAJENDRA KUMAR SAINI

GUDDO

SHEELA

SEEMA

SUNITA

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

25-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

16-03-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

19-02-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

28-01-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

Final Orders / Judgements

25-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: Manoharlal Saini v. Rajendra Kumar Saini (327/2024) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC, accepting that the disputed ancestral property has a prima facie case in the petitioner's favor. The court ordered both parties to maintain the status quo of the property until final judgment—neither party may sell, lease, gift, or make any alterations to the disputed house. Key Reasoning: The court found that the property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and a lease was validly issued in the respondent's name on 13.06.2022. As the petitioner is the respondent's son with a 1/6 share in ancestral property, he has a prima facie right. The court balanced convenience and irreparable harm, determining that preserving the property's status quo protects both parties' interests pending final resolution of the main dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Manoharlal Saini v. Rajendra Kumar Saini (327/2024) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC, accepting that the disputed ancestral property has a prima facie case in the petitioner's favor. The court ordered both parties to maintain the status quo of the property until final judgment—neither party may sell, lease, gift, or make any alterations to the disputed house. Key Reasoning: The court found that the property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and a lease was validly issued in the respondent's name on 13.06.2022. As the petitioner is the respondent's son with a 1/6 share in ancestral property, he has a prima facie right. The court balanced convenience and irreparable harm, determining that preserving the property's status quo protects both parties' interests pending final resolution of the main dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case