MANOHARLAL SAINI vs RAJENDRA KUMAR SAINI — 327/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39.1. Disposed: Contested--Allowed otherwise on 25th April 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJAL010039812024
Filing Number
886/2024
Filing Date
12-09-2024
Registration No
327/2024
Registration Date
20-09-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOHARLAL SAINI
Adv. CHANDRA PRAKASH KUMAWAT
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRA KUMAR SAINI
GUDDO
SHEELA
SEEMA
SUNITA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Disposed
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 19-02-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 28-01-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Manoharlal Saini v. Rajendra Kumar Saini (327/2024) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC, accepting that the disputed ancestral property has a prima facie case in the petitioner's favor. The court ordered both parties to maintain the status quo of the property until final judgment—neither party may sell, lease, gift, or make any alterations to the disputed house. Key Reasoning: The court found that the property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and a lease was validly issued in the respondent's name on 13.06.2022. As the petitioner is the respondent's son with a 1/6 share in ancestral property, he has a prima facie right. The court balanced convenience and irreparable harm, determining that preserving the property's status quo protects both parties' interests pending final resolution of the main dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Manoharlal Saini v. Rajendra Kumar Saini (327/2024) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC, accepting that the disputed ancestral property has a prima facie case in the petitioner's favor. The court ordered both parties to maintain the status quo of the property until final judgment—neither party may sell, lease, gift, or make any alterations to the disputed house. Key Reasoning: The court found that the property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and a lease was validly issued in the respondent's name on 13.06.2022. As the petitioner is the respondent's son with a 1/6 share in ancestral property, he has a prima facie right. The court balanced convenience and irreparable harm, determining that preserving the property's status quo protects both parties' interests pending final resolution of the main dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts