HABBU KHAN vs DEEN MOHAMMAD — 288/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39.1. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 10th April 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJAL010035632024
Filing Number
771/2024
Filing Date
17-08-2024
Registration No
288/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HABBU KHAN
Adv. SACHIN KHATRI
Respondent(s)
DEEN MOHAMMAD
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Disposed
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 07-02-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 19-12-2025 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 04-11-2025 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted an interim injunction in favor of petitioner Habbu Khan against respondent Deen Mohammad, restraining the respondent from selling, mortgaging, or transferring disputed agricultural land (0.80 hectares in Nangla Bhuriya, Ramgarh) until the main case is decided. The court found a prima facie case established, as the respondent failed to complete the sale deed by the stipulated date (20.07.2023) and did not obtain a no-objection certificate from the bank, while the petitioner had already paid the agreed consideration of ₹13,83,120. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted an interim injunction in favor of petitioner Habbu Khan against respondent Deen Mohammad, restraining the respondent from selling, mortgaging, or transferring disputed agricultural land (0.80 hectares in Nangla Bhuriya, Ramgarh) until the main case is decided. The court found a prima facie case established, as the respondent failed to complete the sale deed by the stipulated date (20.07.2023) and did not obtain a no-objection certificate from the bank, while the petitioner had already paid the agreed consideration of ₹13,83,120. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts