State Government vs Salim @ Ganja and others 5 Advocate - Mohammad Rafiq — 104/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJAL010027702024

Filing Number

2104/2024

Filing Date

02-Nov-2016

Registration No

104/2024

Registration Date

08-Nov-2016

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

732

Police Station

SADAR ALWAR

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government

    Adv. Kuldeep Kumar Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Salim @ Ganja and others 5 Advocate - Mohammad Rafiq

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 104/2024 - Summary The court acquitted four accused persons (Ahmad Kaud, Kala Urrf Wakeel, Rahul, and Usman) charged under IPC Section 395 (dacoity) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. While the main victim (truck driver Abbas Khan) died before trial and could not testify, and the injured complainant (Mustaq) identified only two accused (Salim and Wasim) but not the four acquitted, the prosecution failed to establish their participation in the November 16-17, 2015 highway robbery where a truck and Rs. 60,000 were stolen. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  4. 11-May-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  5. 08-May-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  6. 06-May-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  7. 02-May-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  8. 30-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  9. 29-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  10. 27-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  11. 20-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  12. 17-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  13. 10-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  14. 07-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  15. 01-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  16. 24-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  17. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  18. 11-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  19. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  20. 05-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  21. 19-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  22. 10-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  23. 05-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  24. 22-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  25. 20-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  26. 19-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  27. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  28. 29-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  29. 11-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  30. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  31. 06-Oct-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  32. 10-Sep-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  33. 04-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  34. 19-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  35. 10-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  36. 21-Jun-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  37. 16-Jun-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  38. 15-May-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  39. 21-Apr-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  40. 19-Apr-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  41. 25-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  42. 24-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  43. 21-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  44. 21-Feb-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  45. 31-Jan-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  46. 07-Jan-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  47. 25-Nov-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  48. 25-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  49. 23-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  50. 01-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  51. 17-Sep-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  52. 14-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  53. 15-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 02-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 104/2024 - Summary The court acquitted four accused persons (Ahmad Kaud, Kala Urrf Wakeel, Rahul, and Usman) charged under IPC Section 395 (dacoity) due to insufficient prosecution evidence. While the main victim (truck driver Abbas Khan) died before trial and could not testify, and the injured complainant (Mustaq) identified only two accused (Salim and Wasim) but not the four acquitted, the prosecution failed to establish their participation in the November 16-17, 2015 highway robbery where a truck and Rs. 60,000 were stolen. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case