RAJ KUMAR vs LAXMI — 45/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section APPEAL. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Misc. Appeal - CIVIL MISC APPEAL

CNR: RJAL010024442017

Filing Number

934/2017

Filing Date

31-May-2017

Registration No

45/2017

Registration Date

03-Jun-2017

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section APPEAL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR

    Adv. JAGDISH CHANDRA SATIJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Raj Kumar v. Laxmi (45/2017) The High Court dismissed Raj Kumar's appeal challenging a lower court's injunction order dated May 18, 2017, which restrained him from constructing on disputed property in Ramgarh village. The court upheld the injunction, finding that the property belonged to Sohanlal (deceased) and subsequently passed to his heirs (respondent Santosh Devi and others), and that Raj Kumar had no legal right to commence construction work on it after acquiring knowledge of the respondents' superior ownership claim through a registered deed dated April 25, 1995. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  12. 09-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  13. 09-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  14. 19-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  15. 06-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  16. 31-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  17. 03-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  18. 10-Jan-2024

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  19. 08-Nov-2023

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  20. 16-Aug-2023

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  21. 03-May-2023

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  22. 22-Feb-2023

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  23. 30-Nov-2022

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  24. 31-Aug-2022

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  25. 29-Jun-2022

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  26. 05-Mar-2022

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  27. 20-Nov-2021

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  28. 30-Jul-2021

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  29. 06-May-2021

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  30. 04-Feb-2021

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  31. 21-Oct-2020

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  32. 20-Jul-2020

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  33. 22-May-2020

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  34. 24-Apr-2020

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  35. 26-Mar-2020

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  36. 20-Dec-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  37. 03-Oct-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  38. 04-Jul-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  39. 28-Mar-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  40. 03-Jan-2019

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  41. 11-Oct-2018

    Hearing on Admission

  42. 11-Jul-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  43. 28-Mar-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  44. 16-Jan-2018

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  45. 30-Oct-2017

    Hearing on Admission

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  46. 26-Aug-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  47. 06-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 31-May-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Raj Kumar v. Laxmi (45/2017) The High Court dismissed Raj Kumar's appeal challenging a lower court's injunction order dated May 18, 2017, which restrained him from constructing on disputed property in Ramgarh village. The court upheld the injunction, finding that the property belonged to Sohanlal (deceased) and subsequently passed to his heirs (respondent Santosh Devi and others), and that Raj Kumar had no legal right to commence construction work on it after acquiring knowledge of the respondents' superior ownership claim through a registered deed dated April 25, 1995. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case