ASHOK PRADHAN vs GAJRAJ SINGH — 30/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CIVILAPPEAL. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL

CNR: RJAL010014852017

Filing Number

587/2017

Filing Date

07-Apr-2017

Registration No

30/2017

Registration Date

11-Apr-2017

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section CIVILAPPEAL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK PRADHAN

    Adv. SACHIN KHATRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAJRAJ SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 79/2022, CIS No. 30/2017 Petitioners: Ashok Pradhan and Ajay Pradhan Respondents: Gajraj Singh and others Court: District and Sessions Court, Alwar, Rajasthan Decision Date: 28.03.2026 Court's Decision The appellate court dismissed the appeal of the defendants (Ashok Pradhan and others) and upheld the lower court's judgment dated 07.03.2017. The court affirmed that a public well (kua) existed on the disputed temple premises at the location in question, which the defendants unlawfully blocked by constructing a structure over it approximately 6-7 months before the lawsuit. The court directed the defendants to remove the obstruction and restore the well to its prior condition, while prohibiting any further construction work on it. Additionally, costs of the appeal were awarded against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  11. 12-May-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  12. 17-Feb-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  13. 04-Nov-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  14. 05-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  15. 06-May-2024

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  16. 12-Feb-2024

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  17. 16-Nov-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  18. 31-Aug-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  19. 04-May-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  20. 23-Feb-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  21. 01-Dec-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  22. 28-Sep-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  23. 20-Jul-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  24. 09-May-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  25. 14-Mar-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  26. 13-Dec-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  27. 27-Sep-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  28. 14-Jul-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  29. 22-Mar-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  30. 18-Jan-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  31. 21-Oct-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  32. 18-Jul-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  33. 01-May-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  34. 27-Mar-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  35. 18-Jan-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  36. 08-Nov-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  37. 20-Sep-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  38. 29-Jul-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  39. 24-Apr-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  40. 12-Feb-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  41. 23-Oct-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  42. 16-Aug-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  43. 22-May-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  44. 15-Mar-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  45. 21-Dec-2017

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  46. 03-Oct-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  47. 10-Jul-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  48. 06-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  49. 01-Jun-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  50. 31-May-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  51. 24-May-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  52. 19-May-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  53. 18-May-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  54. 08-May-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  55. 03-May-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  56. 29-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  57. 27-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  58. 26-Apr-2017

    Recovery Certificate

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  59. 15-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  60. 13-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 07-Apr-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 79/2022, CIS No. 30/2017 Petitioners: Ashok Pradhan and Ajay Pradhan Respondents: Gajraj Singh and others Court: District and Sessions Court, Alwar, Rajasthan Decision Date: 28.03.2026 Court's Decision The appellate court dismissed the appeal of the defendants (Ashok Pradhan and others) and upheld the lower court's judgment dated 07.03.2017. The court affirmed that a public well (kua) existed on the disputed temple premises at the location in question, which the defendants unlawfully blocked by constructing a structure over it approximately 6-7 months before the lawsuit. The court directed the defendants to remove the obstruction and restore the well to its prior condition, while prohibiting any further construction work on it. Additionally, costs of the appeal were awarded against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case