TARUN SAINI vs State Advocate - APO — 104/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section REVISION. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed otherwise on 27th February 2026.
Cr. Revision
CNR: RJAL010013922024
Filing Number
1064/2024
Filing Date
27-03-2024
Registration No
104/2024
Registration Date
09-04-2024
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Decision Date
27th February 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed otherwise
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TARUN SAINI
Adv. TARUN SAINI
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 27-02-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional District and Sessions Court, Alwar rejected Tarun Saini's civil revision petition challenging a Chief Judicial Magistrate's order dismissing his complaint against municipal officials and neighbors regarding illegal encroachment and nuisance in Bank Colony. The court found that Saini failed to provide independent corroborating evidence beyond his own statements, and the lower court order contained no illegality or procedural irregularity warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional District and Sessions Court, Alwar rejected Tarun Saini's civil revision petition challenging a Chief Judicial Magistrate's order dismissing his complaint against municipal officials and neighbors regarding illegal encroachment and nuisance in Bank Colony. The court found that Saini failed to provide independent corroborating evidence beyond his own statements, and the lower court order contained no illegality or procedural irregularity warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts