State vs HARUN — 62/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,323,341,452,325,308,354,336. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJAL010012872023

Filing Number

895/2023

Filing Date

22-Mar-2023

Registration No

62/2023

Registration Date

27-Mar-2023

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

5-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

505

Police Station

SADAR ALWAR

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,323,341,452,325,308,354,336

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARUN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 62/2023 Summary Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Court, Alwar acquitted accused Harun Khan and six co-accused under IPC Sections 143, 452/149, 336/149, 354/149, and 308/149 due to insufficient prosecution evidence, though convictions were earlier recorded under Sections 323, 341, and 325 based on a compromise settlement. The court found the victim witness unreliable (contradictory testimony) and prosecution evidence inadequate to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  14. 01-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  16. 08-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  17. 21-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  18. 05-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  19. 09-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  20. 29-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  21. 25-Apr-2024

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  22. 13-Feb-2024

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  23. 05-Dec-2023

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  24. 05-Oct-2023

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  25. 20-Jul-2023

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  26. 13-Jun-2023

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  27. 08-May-2023

    Compliance

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  28. 27-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 22-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case 62/2023 Summary Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Court, Alwar acquitted accused Harun Khan and six co-accused under IPC Sections 143, 452/149, 336/149, 354/149, and 308/149 due to insufficient prosecution evidence, though convictions were earlier recorded under Sections 323, 341, and 325 based on a compromise settlement. The court found the victim witness unreliable (contradictory testimony) and prosecution evidence inadequate to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case