GURDEEP SINGH URF BILLU vs State Advocate - APO — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL010011802026

Filing Number

912/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

BAGAD TIRAYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURDEEP SINGH URF BILLU

    Adv. AAS MOHAMMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 316/2026 - Gurdeep Singh URF Billu v. State The Session Judge granted bail to Gurdeep Singh (age 50) arrested on March 1, 2026, for allegedly possessing approximately 10 liters of illegal liquor under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Abkari Act. While acknowledging the petitioner's six prior criminal cases involving similar offenses and the State's opposition based on the gravity of the offense, the court found bail justified considering the length of custody since arrest and the time required for trial completion. The bail was granted subject to a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 316/2026 - Gurdeep Singh URF Billu v. State The Session Judge granted bail to Gurdeep Singh (age 50) arrested on March 1, 2026, for allegedly possessing approximately 10 liters of illegal liquor under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Abkari Act. While acknowledging the petitioner's six prior criminal cases involving similar offenses and the State's opposition based on the gravity of the offense, the court found bail justified considering the length of custody since arrest and the time required for trial completion. The bail was granted subject to a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case