GURDEEP SINGH URF BILLU vs State Advocate - APO — 316/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAL010011802026
Filing Number
912/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
316/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
BAGAD TIRAYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GURDEEP SINGH URF BILLU
Adv. AAS MOHAMMAD
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 316/2026 - Gurdeep Singh URF Billu v. State The Session Judge granted bail to Gurdeep Singh (age 50) arrested on March 1, 2026, for allegedly possessing approximately 10 liters of illegal liquor under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Abkari Act. While acknowledging the petitioner's six prior criminal cases involving similar offenses and the State's opposition based on the gravity of the offense, the court found bail justified considering the length of custody since arrest and the time required for trial completion. The bail was granted subject to a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 316/2026 - Gurdeep Singh URF Billu v. State The Session Judge granted bail to Gurdeep Singh (age 50) arrested on March 1, 2026, for allegedly possessing approximately 10 liters of illegal liquor under Section 16/54 of the Rajasthan Abkari Act. While acknowledging the petitioner's six prior criminal cases involving similar offenses and the State's opposition based on the gravity of the offense, the court found bail justified considering the length of custody since arrest and the time required for trial completion. The bail was granted subject to a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts