ALIM KHAN vs State Advocate - APO — 315/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL010011792026

Case disposed

Filing Number

911/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

315/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

FIR Details

FIR Number

245

Police Station

VAISHALI NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

ALIM KHAN

Adv. AMZAD KHAN

Respondent(s)

State Advocate - APO

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 315/2026 - ALIM KHAN v. State Advocate Court Decision: The Session Judge of Alwar rejected Alim Khan's third bail application under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. Khan is accused of operating a cyber fraud syndicate involving ₹19.02 crores in fraudulent transactions across 32 bank accounts, acting as a "mule" provider by supplying compromised bank accounts to facilitate cybercrime. Key Reasoning: The court found substantial evidence linking Khan to an organized criminal conspiracy involving multiple co-accused (Barkat Ali, Harisingh, Jahul Khan, Mukesh Meena), with records showing his direct involvement in providing mule accounts and receiving commissions. Given the serious nature of the offenses under IPC Sections 318(2), 318(4), 112(2), 61(2), and DRAT Section 66, combined with Khan's prior criminal history (four other cases pending), the court determined bail was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 315/2026 - ALIM KHAN v. State Advocate Court Decision: The Session Judge of Alwar rejected Alim Khan's third bail application under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. Khan is accused of operating a cyber fraud syndicate involving ₹19.02 crores in fraudulent transactions across 32 bank accounts, acting as a "mule" provider by supplying compromised bank accounts to facilitate cybercrime. Key Reasoning: The court found substantial evidence linking Khan to an organized criminal conspiracy involving multiple co-accused (Barkat Ali, Harisingh, Jahul Khan, Mukesh Meena), with records showing his direct involvement in providing mule accounts and receiving commissions. Given the serious nature of the offenses under IPC Sections 318(2), 318(4), 112(2), 61(2), and DRAT Section 66, combined with Khan's prior criminal history (four other cases pending), the court determined bail was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case