NAVEEN KUMAR vs State Advocate - APO — 314/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL010011782026

Filing Number

910/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

2-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

UDYOG NAGAR(MIA)

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVEEN KUMAR

    Adv. BHUPENDRA YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Case Summary: 314/2026 (Istaq v. State) Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Istaq under Section 483 CrPC on 23.03.2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that Istaq is the primary accused in a serious cybercrime extortion case involving kidnapping, criminal intimidation, and extortion. The accused allegedly orchestrated an organized criminal gang that abducted the complainant Sahil Khan on 28.01.2025, extorted ₹4 lakhs through threats and violence involving firearms, and coordinated the extortion via cyber fraud. Despite being arrested approximately one year prior, Istaq has not cooperated in the investigation and co-accused Indu and Kallu have already received bail relief from the High Court only based on settlement with the complainant. The court determined that given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 140(2), 115(2), 127(2), 308(5), 351(3), and 61(2)(a) (attracting death penalty or life imprisonment), and the organized nature of the crime, bail at this stage was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 314/2026 (Istaq v. State) Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Istaq under Section 483 CrPC on 23.03.2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that Istaq is the primary accused in a serious cybercrime extortion case involving kidnapping, criminal intimidation, and extortion. The accused allegedly orchestrated an organized criminal gang that abducted the complainant Sahil Khan on 28.01.2025, extorted ₹4 lakhs through threats and violence involving firearms, and coordinated the extortion via cyber fraud. Despite being arrested approximately one year prior, Istaq has not cooperated in the investigation and co-accused Indu and Kallu have already received bail relief from the High Court only based on settlement with the complainant. The court determined that given the gravity of charges under IPC Sections 140(2), 115(2), 127(2), 308(5), 351(3), and 61(2)(a) (attracting death penalty or life imprisonment), and the organized nature of the crime, bail at this stage was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case