LOKESH KUMAR URF KUDI vs State Advocate - APO — 310/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAL010011732026
Filing Number
905/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
310/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
08
Police Station
Akhaipura
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LOKESH KUMAR URF KUDI
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 310/2026 (Lokesh Kumar URF Kudi v. State) The Session Court, Alwar granted bail to 19-year-old Lokesh Kumar (accused of theft at a school on 13.01.2026) under Section 483 CrPC, despite the State's opposition. The court considered that the accused had already spent approximately 56 days in police/judicial custody since arrest on 20.01.2026, the stolen items were recovered, the FIR was filed against unknown persons initially, and investigation was complete with chargesheet filed under BNS Sections 331(4), 305(a), 112(2). Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 310/2026 (Lokesh Kumar URF Kudi v. State) The Session Court, Alwar granted bail to 19-year-old Lokesh Kumar (accused of theft at a school on 13.01.2026) under Section 483 CrPC, despite the State's opposition. The court considered that the accused had already spent approximately 56 days in police/judicial custody since arrest on 20.01.2026, the stolen items were recovered, the FIR was filed against unknown persons initially, and investigation was complete with chargesheet filed under BNS Sections 331(4), 305(a), 112(2). Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts