MISROOP URF ISLOOP vs State Advocate - APO — 307/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Cancelled on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAL010011572026
Filing Number
896/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
307/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
2-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Cancelled
FIR Details
FIR Number
544
Police Station
MALAKHEDA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MISROOP URF ISLOOP
Adv. MUNIRAJ SINGH CHOUHAN
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Orders |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CIS 307/2026 The court rejected the bail petition of Misroop Urf Isloop, a 35-year-old accused of serious charges including attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with weapons. The petitioner was arrested following an alleged incident on December 26, 2024, where he reportedly attempted to hit a government vehicle with his car to evade police during a night patrol, resulting in gunfire being discharged at the vehicle. The court found that given the petitioner's history of approximately 17 prior criminal cases involving violent offenses against police, the serious nature of the charges, and his active criminal background, bail at this stage was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CIS 307/2026 The court rejected the bail petition of Misroop Urf Isloop, a 35-year-old accused of serious charges including attempted murder, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation with weapons. The petitioner was arrested following an alleged incident on December 26, 2024, where he reportedly attempted to hit a government vehicle with his car to evade police during a night patrol, resulting in gunfire being discharged at the vehicle. The court found that given the petitioner's history of approximately 17 prior criminal cases involving violent offenses against police, the serious nature of the charges, and his active criminal background, bail at this stage was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts