SABNUR KHAN vs State — 303/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL010011472026

Filing Number

886/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

303/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

CYBER POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABNUR KHAN

    Adv. AMZAD KHAN

  2. 2.MOHAMMAD MUSTJAHER NASIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 303/2026 The Sessions Court, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Sabnur Khan and Mohammad Mustjaher Nasir under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the accused were involved in an international cyber-enabled human trafficking and fraud scheme operating from Myanmar, where they lured Indian workers with false job promises, charged them fees (₹19,000-23,500), and forced them into bonded labor in cyber scam camps with 116+ detained workers. Given the serious charges under IPC Sections 143(2), 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b), the Emigration Act 1983, and IT Act Section 66, the court deemed bail unjustified, noting the Alwar region's notoriety for such crimes and the risk that granting bail would encourage further electronic fraud cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 303/2026 The Sessions Court, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Sabnur Khan and Mohammad Mustjaher Nasir under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the accused were involved in an international cyber-enabled human trafficking and fraud scheme operating from Myanmar, where they lured Indian workers with false job promises, charged them fees (₹19,000-23,500), and forced them into bonded labor in cyber scam camps with 116+ detained workers. Given the serious charges under IPC Sections 143(2), 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b), the Emigration Act 1983, and IT Act Section 66, the court deemed bail unjustified, noting the Alwar region's notoriety for such crimes and the risk that granting bail would encourage further electronic fraud cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case