SABNUR KHAN vs State — 303/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL010011472026

Case disposed

Filing Number

886/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

303/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

CYBER POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

SABNUR KHAN

Adv. AMZAD KHAN

MOHAMMAD MUSTJAHER NASIR

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 303/2026 The Sessions Court, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Sabnur Khan and Mohammad Mustjaher Nasir under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the accused were involved in an international cyber-enabled human trafficking and fraud scheme operating from Myanmar, where they lured Indian workers with false job promises, charged them fees (₹19,000-23,500), and forced them into bonded labor in cyber scam camps with 116+ detained workers. Given the serious charges under IPC Sections 143(2), 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b), the Emigration Act 1983, and IT Act Section 66, the court deemed bail unjustified, noting the Alwar region's notoriety for such crimes and the risk that granting bail would encourage further electronic fraud cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 303/2026 The Sessions Court, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Sabnur Khan and Mohammad Mustjaher Nasir under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the accused were involved in an international cyber-enabled human trafficking and fraud scheme operating from Myanmar, where they lured Indian workers with false job promises, charged them fees (₹19,000-23,500), and forced them into bonded labor in cyber scam camps with 116+ detained workers. Given the serious charges under IPC Sections 143(2), 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b), the Emigration Act 1983, and IT Act Section 66, the court deemed bail unjustified, noting the Alwar region's notoriety for such crimes and the risk that granting bail would encourage further electronic fraud cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case