SABNUR KHAN vs State — 303/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAL010011472026
Filing Number
886/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
303/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
CYBER POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SABNUR KHAN
Adv. AMZAD KHAN
MOHAMMAD MUSTJAHER NASIR
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 303/2026 The Sessions Court, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Sabnur Khan and Mohammad Mustjaher Nasir under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the accused were involved in an international cyber-enabled human trafficking and fraud scheme operating from Myanmar, where they lured Indian workers with false job promises, charged them fees (₹19,000-23,500), and forced them into bonded labor in cyber scam camps with 116+ detained workers. Given the serious charges under IPC Sections 143(2), 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b), the Emigration Act 1983, and IT Act Section 66, the court deemed bail unjustified, noting the Alwar region's notoriety for such crimes and the risk that granting bail would encourage further electronic fraud cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 303/2026 The Sessions Court, Alwar rejected the bail petition filed by Sabnur Khan and Mohammad Mustjaher Nasir under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the accused were involved in an international cyber-enabled human trafficking and fraud scheme operating from Myanmar, where they lured Indian workers with false job promises, charged them fees (₹19,000-23,500), and forced them into bonded labor in cyber scam camps with 116+ detained workers. Given the serious charges under IPC Sections 143(2), 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b), the Emigration Act 1983, and IT Act Section 66, the court deemed bail unjustified, noting the Alwar region's notoriety for such crimes and the risk that granting bail would encourage further electronic fraud cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts